Hi Stephan!
Thank you for your answer.
I appreciate your efforts and I know how busy you and other Flink
committers are.
I am looking forward for the upcoming discussion of Flink modules!
Best regards,
Ivan.
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 at 11:32 Stephan Ewen wrote:
> Hi Ivan!
>
> Thank you for bringin
Hi Ivan!
Thank you for bringing this thread up. I agree, we need to do something
about how some modules are currently handled.
The CEP library definitely needs more active committers. Adding new
committers will be necessary, I think, but as you mentioned, it needs at
least one (better more) exper
Hi Alexey,
I agree with you. Most contributors are overloaded, but PRs for other
sub-projects are reviewed much faster. In my experience, in most cases, you
can get a first review for a PR in less than a week and it's usually merged
within a month or less.
Flink CEP is a notable exception. I belie
Hi Ivan,
I think problem not only with CEP project.
Main contributors overloaded and simple fixes frequently are staying as PR
without merge.
You can see how amount of open PR increasing over time.
Thanks,
Alexey Diomin
2017-01-15 17:18 GMT+04:00 Ivan Mushketyk :
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> Your contrib
Hi Dmitry,
Your contributions are welcomed, but right now the most critical issue is
that CEP project does not have an experienced Flink contributor who can
review and approve new pull requests.
I hope that Flink community will promptly resolve the issue, so feel free
to take select a JIRA issue
I would be interested to contribute to CEP. I am following Flink project,
but haven't contributed yet. Next 2 weeks I am a bit busy with my work, but
then I llbe happy to dig into it. I used to work in IoT so event processing
is a close topic for me.
Dmitry.
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 at 14:58, Ivan Mush
Hi Till,
Thank you for your reply.
I wonder if the following will work.
What if you can find a Flink committer/committers that will review and
iterate on CEP PRs before you review them. They don't need to know all CEP
internals, but they will help to eradicate most of the issues.
Then you will ha
Hi Ivan,
first of all let me apologise for the bad experience you've had with
opening CEP PRs in the past.
The general problem as you've said is that there is nobody who reviews the
open PRs. I used to do this in the but at the moment I hardly find time due
to other commitments.
I think the way
+1
I have some clientes interested in CEP features
El 11/1/17 16:23, "Ivan Mushketyk" escribió:
Hi Flink devs,
Roughly half a year ago I implemented several PRs for Flink-CEP[1][2][3]
but since then there were no progress with the reviews. What is frustrating
about this situati
Hi Flink devs,
Roughly half a year ago I implemented several PRs for Flink-CEP[1][2][3]
but since then there were no progress with the reviews. What is frustrating
about this situation is that Flink customers are asking for features in
these PRs. For example customers commented on [1] and [2] aski
10 matches
Mail list logo
