> the lightning talks. If I recall correctly, it was primarily turned to
> > > invite-only due to spam. But definitely good to validate that.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 11:09 AM Maximilian Michels
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> The re
to spam. But definitely good to validate that.
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 11:09 AM Maximilian Michels
> wrote:
> >
> >> The registration problem should be solvable. Maybe it is due to the
> Slack
> >> pricing model that the ASF Slack is invite-only.
that.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 11:09 AM Maximilian Michels wrote:
The registration problem should be solvable. Maybe it is due to the Slack
pricing model that the ASF Slack is invite-only. I'll ping the community
mailing list.
Have these issues at any point been discussed with the ASF? I
lem should be solvable. Maybe it is due to the Slack
> pricing model that the ASF Slack is invite-only. I'll ping the community
> mailing list.
>
> Have these issues at any point been discussed with the ASF? I feel like
> this is one of the examples where a community spins
The registration problem should be solvable. Maybe it is due to the Slack
pricing model that the ASF Slack is invite-only. I'll ping the community
mailing list.
Have these issues at any point been discussed with the ASF? I feel like
this is one of the examples where a community spins off
t;
> In the initial discussion for creating the Slack workspace [1], leveraging
> the ASF Slack was indeed brought up as an alternative by many folks. I
> think we have chosen a dedicated Flink Slack over the ASF Slack mainly for
> two reasons.
> - ASF Slack is limited to people with an @ap
Hi Max,
Thanks for bringing this up. I'm open to a re-evaluation of the Slack
usages.
In the initial discussion for creating the Slack workspace [1], leveraging
the ASF Slack was indeed brought up as an alternative by many folks. I
think we have chosen a dedicated Flink Slack over the ASF
an invite link that they can use. Maybe not the most
>> > straight-forward process but I think it doesn't stop users from joining.
>> >
>> > That's only possible to use for those with an @apache.org e-mail
>> address,
>> > see https://infra.apache.org/slack.html
vite link that they can use. Maybe not the most
> > straight-forward process but I think it doesn't stop users from joining.
> >
> > That's only possible to use for those with an @apache.org e-mail
> address,
> > see https://infra.apache.org/slack.html. Anyone
wouldn't be in favour of needing to spend
> committers time in adding/inviting members on an ASF Slack instance.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Martijn
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 12:33 PM Maximilian Michels wrote:
>
>> Hey Martijn, hi Chesnay,
>>
>> >The big pr
use for those with an @apache.org e-mail address,
see https://infra.apache.org/slack.html. Anyone else would need to be
invited by a committer, but I wouldn't be in favour of needing to spend
committers time in adding/inviting members on an ASF Slack instance.
Best regards,
Martijn
On Fri, Nov 4, 2
Hey Martijn, hi Chesnay,
>The big problem of using the ASF Slack instance is that users can join any
Slack channel, including ones outside of Flink.
That is one of the main motivations for proposing to move to the ASF Slack.
We can create an unlimited number of "flink-XY" channe
2:23 PM Martijn Visser
wrote:
Hi Max,
From my experience, most ASF projects actually don't use the official
Slack, but their own instance. That has happened with Airflow, Iceberg,
Hudi etc.
The big problem of using the ASF Slack instance is that users can join any
Slack channel, including o
use the official
> Slack, but their own instance. That has happened with Airflow, Iceberg,
> Hudi etc.
> The big problem of using the ASF Slack instance is that users can join any
> Slack channel, including ones outside of Flink. Not to mention that
> non-committers need to be invited by
Hi Max,
>From my experience, most ASF projects actually don't use the official
Slack, but their own instance. That has happened with Airflow, Iceberg,
Hudi etc.
The big problem of using the ASF Slack instance is that users can join any
Slack channel, including ones outside of Flink
Hi,
A while ago the Flink community decided to create a Slack workspace [1]. I
wonder, is there a particular reason why we created our own Slack workspace
and do not use the official ASF Slack [2]? It looks like most ASF projects
use the official Slack. Using the official Slack makes
16 matches
Mail list logo
