Hi everyone,
I am hereby canceling the vote due to:
FLINK-15917
FLINK-15918
FLINK-15935
FLINK-15937
RC3 will be created later today.
Best,
Gary
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 4:39 PM Andrey Zagrebin wrote:
> alright, thanks for confirming this Benchao!
>
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 6:36
alright, thanks for confirming this Benchao!
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 6:36 PM Benchao Li wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> I noticed that 1.10 has changed to enabling background cleanup by default
> just after I posted to this email.
> So it won't affect 1.10 any more, just affect 1.9.x. We can move to the
Hi Andrey,
I noticed that 1.10 has changed to enabling background cleanup by default
just after I posted to this email.
So it won't affect 1.10 any more, just affect 1.9.x. We can move to the
Jira ticket to discuss further more.
Andrey Zagrebin 于2020年2月6日周四 下午11:30写道：
> Hi Benchao,
>
> Do you o
Hi Benchao,
Do you observe this issue FLINK-15938 with 1.9 or 1.10?
If with 1.9, I suggest to check with 1.10.
Thanks,
Andrey
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 4:07 PM Benchao Li wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I found another issue[1], I don't know if it should be a blocker. But it
> does affects joins without win
Hi all,
I found another issue[1], I don't know if it should be a blocker. But it
does affects joins without window in blink planner.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15938
Jeff Zhang 于2020年2月6日周四 下午5:05写道：
> Hi Jingsong,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. It works for running it in
Hi Jingsong,
Thanks for the suggestion. It works for running it in IDE, but for
downstream project like Zeppelin where I will include flink jars in
classpath.
it only works when I specify the jars one by one explicitly in classpath,
using * doesn't work.
e.g.
The following command where I use *
Hi Jeff,
For FLINK-15935 [1],
I try to think of it as a non blocker. But it's really an important issue.
The problem is the class loading order. We want to load the class in the
blink-planner.jar, but actually load the class in the flink-planner.jar.
First of all, the order of class loading
There is a blocker issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15937
Best,
Jincheng
Jeff Zhang 于2020年2月6日周四 下午3:09写道：
> -1, I just found one critical issue
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15935
> This ticket means user unable to use watermark in sql if he specify both
> f
-1, I just found one critical issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15935
This ticket means user unable to use watermark in sql if he specify both
flink planner and blink planner in pom.xml
org.apache.flink
flink-table-planner_${scala.binary.version}
${project.version}
o
I deployed commit 81cf2f9e59259389a6549b07dcf822ec63c899a4 and can confirm
that the dataformat-cbor and checkpoint alignment metric issues are
resolved.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 11:26 AM Gary Yao wrote:
> Note that there is currently an ongoing discussion about whether
> FLINK-15917
> and FLINK-1
Note that there is currently an ongoing discussion about whether FLINK-15917
and FLINK-15918 should be fixed in 1.10.0 [1].
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/flink-dev/202002.mbox/%3CCA%2B5xAo3D21-T5QysQg3XOdm%3DL9ipz3rMkA%3DqMzxraJRgfuyg2A%40mail.gmail.com%3E
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 8:
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 1.10.0,
as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* JIRA release notes [1],
*
12 matches
Mail list logo
