The vote for FLIP-491: BundledAggregateFunction for batched aggregation [1]
has concluded (discussion thread [2]). The vote will be closed [3].
There were 4 approving votes, all binding, and there were no disapprovals:
-Timo Walther (binding)
- Fabian Hüske (binding)
- Stefan Richter (binding)
-
+1 (binding)
Op ma 24 feb 2025 om 11:06 schreef Stefan Richter
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Stefan
>
> On 2025/02/24 14:15:09 Fabian Hüske wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Fabian
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:32 PM Timo Walther
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Than
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Stefan
On 2025/02/24 14:15:09 Fabian Hüske wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thank you,
> Fabian
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:32 PM Timo Walther wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks for working on this FLIP.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Timo
> >
> > On 14.02.25 22:32, Alan She
+1 (binding)
Thank you,
Fabian
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:32 PM Timo Walther wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for working on this FLIP.
>
> Best regards,
> Timo
>
> On 14.02.25 22:32, Alan Sheinberg wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-491 [1]. It proposes
> > adding
+1 (binding)
Thanks for working on this FLIP.
Best regards,
Timo
On 14.02.25 22:32, Alan Sheinberg wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-491 [1]. It proposes
adding BundledAggregateFunction as an interface that aggregate function
UDFs can implement. The interface exposes a batc
Hi everyone,
I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-491 [1]. It proposes
adding BundledAggregateFunction as an interface that aggregate function
UDFs can implement. The interface exposes a batch method which should make
calling out to external services more efficient, whether fetching data or
doing remo
