n support [1]. In the discussion for FLIP-498, we
> decided
> > > >> to discard FLIP-313 as it has been abandoned for a while.
> > > >>
> > > >> I hope this is ok for everyone. @Alan might give some timeline when
> > this
> > > >>
fluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-498%3A+AsyncTableFunction+for+async+table+function+support
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 26.05.25 07:51, Teunissen, F.G.J. (Fred) wrote:
> > >>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>
> > >>> We curren
urce and join it using FOR
> >> SYSTEM TIME AS OF This approach has some challenges, especially
> when
> >> used after aggregations .
> >>>
> >>> Introducing support for an async UDTF would allow us to perform the
> join
> >> usi
nissen
From: Becket Qin
Date: Thursday, 22 May 2025 at 17:08
To: dev@flink.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] FLIP-313: Add support of User Defined
AsyncTableFunction
I just realized this FLIP has never been voted to pass.
+1 to the FLIP.
This is actually something long overdue. I feel it is eve
the join
> using LATERAL TABLE, which would greatly simplify the query structure and
> improve maintainability.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Fred Teunissen
> >
> > From: Becket Qin
> > Date: Thursday, 22 May 2025 at 17:08
> > To: dev@flink.apache.org
> >
Qin
Date: Thursday, 22 May 2025 at 17:08
To: dev@flink.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] FLIP-313: Add support of User Defined AsyncTableFunction
I just realized this FLIP has never been voted to pass.
+1 to the FLIP.
This is actually something long overdue. I feel it is even more like a bug
that
greatly simplify the query structure and improve
maintainability.
Kind regards,
Fred Teunissen
From: Becket Qin
Date: Thursday, 22 May 2025 at 17:08
To: dev@flink.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] FLIP-313: Add support of User Defined AsyncTableFunction
I just realized this FLIP has never been voted
I just realized this FLIP has never been voted to pass.
+1 to the FLIP.
This is actually something long overdue. I feel it is even more like a bug
that we need to fix than a feature.
Thanks,
Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 7:36 PM Aitozi wrote:
> Hi devs:
> The last comments
Hi devs:
The last comments in [1] has been addressed, I'd like to restart this
vote thread.
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (until June 29th, 10:00AM GMT)
unless there is an objection or an insufficient number of votes.
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/7vk1799ryvrz4lsm5254q64ctm
Hi all,
Thanks for all the feedback about FLIP-313: Add support of User Defined
AsyncTableFunction[1]. Based on the discussion [2], we have come to a
consensus, so I would like to start a vote.
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (until June 19th, 10:00AM GMT)
unless there is an objecti
10 matches
Mail list logo
