I just realized this FLIP has never been voted to pass. +1 to the FLIP. This is actually something long overdue. I feel it is even more like a bug that we need to fix than a feature.
Thanks, Jiangjie (Becket) Qin On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 7:36 PM Aitozi <gjying1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi devs: > The last comments in [1] has been addressed, I'd like to restart this > vote thread. > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (until June 29th, 10:00AM GMT) > unless there is an objection or an insufficient number of votes. > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/7vk1799ryvrz4lsm5254q64ctm89mx2l > [2] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-313%3A+Add+support+of+User+Defined+AsyncTableFunction > > Best regards, > Aitozi > > Aitozi <gjying1...@gmail.com> 于2023年6月14日周三 09:47写道： > > > Hi all, > > Thanks for all the feedback about FLIP-313: Add support of User > > Defined AsyncTableFunction[1]. Based on the discussion [2], we have come > to > > a consensus, so I would like to start a vote. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (until June 19th, 10:00AM > GMT) > > unless there is an objection or an insufficient number of votes. > > > > > > [1] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-313%3A+Add+support+of+User+Defined+AsyncTableFunction > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/7vk1799ryvrz4lsm5254q64ctm89mx2l > > > > Best regards, > > Aitozi > > >
