Hi all,
I'm happy to announce that FLIP-188 is approved. We have 8 approving votes,
5 of which are binding:
Neng Lu (non-binding)
Kurt Young (binding)
Yufei Zhang (non-binding)
Jing Zhang (non-binding)
Jark Wu (binding)
Stephan Ewen (binding)
Timo Walther (binding)
Godfrey He (binding)
Tha
+1 (binding)
Best,
Godfrey
Jark Wu 于2021年11月30日周二 下午5:47写道:
>
> Thanks for the great discussion and updating.
> Still +1 from my side.
>
> Best,
> Jark
>
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 17:27, Kurt Young wrote:
>
> > +1 from my side.
> >
> > Best,
> > Kurt
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 5:12 PM
Thanks for the great discussion and updating.
Still +1 from my side.
Best,
Jark
On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 17:27, Kurt Young wrote:
> +1 from my side.
>
> Best,
> Kurt
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 5:12 PM Jingsong Li
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Many thanks to Stephan and Timo, this makes
+1 from my side.
Best,
Kurt
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 5:12 PM Jingsong Li wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Many thanks to Stephan and Timo, this makes the design of FLIP much
> clearer and more reliable.
>
> I request that you can take another look at the updated FLIP and
> please respond directly if y
Hi everyone,
Many thanks to Stephan and Timo, this makes the design of FLIP much
clearer and more reliable.
I request that you can take another look at the updated FLIP and
please respond directly if you have feedback.
(I will contact binding voters directly to confirm)
Best,
Jingsong
On Tue,
Thanks for the healthy discussion. Also +1 from my side for this FLIP.
Thanks,
Timo
On 24.11.21 19:05, Stephan Ewen wrote:
Thanks for all the details and explanation.
With the conclusion of the discussion, also +1 from my side for this FLIP
On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 12:23 PM Jingsong Li wrote:
Thanks for all the details and explanation.
With the conclusion of the discussion, also +1 from my side for this FLIP
On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 12:23 PM Jingsong Li wrote:
> Thanks Stephan and Timo, I have a rough look at your replies. They are
> all valuable opinions. I will take time to discuss
Thanks Stephan and Timo, I have a rough look at your replies. They are
all valuable opinions. I will take time to discuss, explain and
improve them.
Hi Timo,
> At least a final "I will start the vote soon. Last call for comments." would
> have been nice.
I replied in the DISCUSS thread that we b
Hi everyone,
even though the DISCUSS thread was open for 2 weeks. I have the feeling
that the VOTE was initiated to quickly. At least a final "I will start
the vote soon. Last call for comments." would have been nice.
I also added some comments in the DISCUSS thread. Let's hope we can
resolv
Hi all!
I have a few questions on the design still, posted those in the [DISCUSS]
thread.
It would be great to clarify those first before concluding this vote.
Thanks,
Stephan
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 7:22 AM Jark Wu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for the great work Jingsong!
>
> Best,
> Jar
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the great work Jingsong!
Best,
Jark
On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 at 19:41, JING ZHANG wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> A small suggestion:
> The message queue is currently used to store middle layer data of the
> streaming data warehouse. We hope use built-in dynamic table storage
+1 (non-binding)
A small suggestion:
The message queue is currently used to store middle layer data of the
streaming data warehouse. We hope use built-in dynamic table storage to
store those middle layer.
But those middle data of the streaming data warehouse are often provided to
all business team
Hi,
+1 (non-binding)
Very interesting design. I saw a lot of discussion on the generic interface
design, good to know it will address extensibility.
Cheers,
Yufei
On 2021/11/10 02:51:55 Jingsong Li wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Thanks for all the feedback so far. Based on the discussion[1] we s
Hi Neng,
Thanks for your voting and suggestions.
Although we will not propose a public interface for LogStore, there is
no doubt that it will be interfaced to avoid a hardcoded Kafka
LogStore.
Best,
Jingsong
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 11:44 AM Kurt Young wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Kurt
>
+1 (binding)
Best,
Kurt
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 10:52 AM Jingsong Li wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Thanks for all the feedback so far. Based on the discussion[1] we seem
> to have consensus, so I would like to start a vote on FLIP-188 for
> which the FLIP has now also been updated[2].
>
> The vote
Hi,
+1 for (non-binding)
Also, I'm curious to see if we can avoid a hardcoded dependency on Kafka for
the LogStore. This will make the solution more extensible.
On 2021/11/10 02:51:55 Jingsong Li wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Thanks for all the feedback so far. Based on the discussion[1] we seem
Hi everyone,
Thanks for all the feedback so far. Based on the discussion[1] we seem
to have consensus, so I would like to start a vote on FLIP-188 for
which the FLIP has now also been updated[2].
The vote will last for at least 72 hours (Nov 13th 3:00 GMT) unless
there is an objection or insuffic
17 matches
Mail list logo