Thanks for the great discussion and updating. Still +1 from my side. Best, Jark
On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 17:27, Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 from my side. > > Best, > Kurt > > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 5:12 PM Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Many thanks to Stephan and Timo, this makes the design of FLIP much > > clearer and more reliable. > > > > I request that you can take another look at the updated FLIP and > > please respond directly if you have feedback. > > > > (I will contact binding voters directly to confirm) > > > > Best, > > Jingsong > > > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 4:32 PM Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks for the healthy discussion. Also +1 from my side for this FLIP. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Timo > > > > > > On 24.11.21 19:05, Stephan Ewen wrote: > > > > Thanks for all the details and explanation. > > > > > > > > With the conclusion of the discussion, also +1 from my side for this > > FLIP > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 12:23 PM Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Thanks Stephan and Timo, I have a rough look at your replies. They > are > > > >> all valuable opinions. I will take time to discuss, explain and > > > >> improve them. > > > >> > > > >> Hi Timo, > > > >>> At least a final "I will start the vote soon. Last call for > > comments." > > > >> would have been nice. > > > >> > > > >> I replied in the DISCUSS thread that we began to vote. If there are > > > >> supplementary comments or reply "pause voting first, I will reply > > > >> later", we can suspend or cancel the voting at any time. > > > >> I understand why the FLIP must take three days to vote, so that more > > > >> people can see it and put forward their opinions. > > > >> > > > >> Best, > > > >> Jingsong > > > >> > > > >> On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 1:27 AM Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> Hi everyone, > > > >>> > > > >>> even though the DISCUSS thread was open for 2 weeks. I have the > > feeling > > > >>> that the VOTE was initiated to quickly. At least a final "I will > > start > > > >>> the vote soon. Last call for comments." would have been nice. > > > >>> > > > >>> I also added some comments in the DISCUSS thread. Let's hope we can > > > >>> resolve those soon. > > > >>> > > > >>> Regards, > > > >>> Timo > > > >>> > > > >>> On 12.11.21 16:36, Stephan Ewen wrote: > > > >>>> Hi all! > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I have a few questions on the design still, posted those in the > > > >> [DISCUSS] > > > >>>> thread. > > > >>>> It would be great to clarify those first before concluding this > > vote. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Thanks, > > > >>>> Stephan > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 7:22 AM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> +1 (binding) > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Thanks for the great work Jingsong! > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Best, > > > >>>>> Jark > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 at 19:41, JING ZHANG <beyond1...@gmail.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> A small suggestion: > > > >>>>>> The message queue is currently used to store middle layer data > of > > the > > > >>>>>> streaming data warehouse. We hope use built-in dynamic table > > storage > > > >> to > > > >>>>>> store those middle layer. > > > >>>>>> But those middle data of the streaming data warehouse are often > > > >> provided > > > >>>>> to > > > >>>>>> all business teams in a company. Some teams have not use Apache > > > >> Flink as > > > >>>>>> compute engine yet. In order to continue server those teams, the > > > >> data in > > > >>>>>> built-in dynamic table storage may be needed to copied to > message > > > >> queue > > > >>>>>> again. > > > >>>>>> If *the built-in storage could provide same consumer API as the > > > >> commonly > > > >>>>>> used message queues*, data copying may be avoided. So the > built-in > > > >>>>> dynamic > > > >>>>>> table storage may be promoted faster in the streaming data > > warehouse > > > >>>>>> business. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Best regards, > > > >>>>>> Jing Zhang > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Yufei Zhang <a...@apache.org> 于2021年11月11日周四 上午9:34写道： > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Hi, > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Very interesting design. I saw a lot of discussion on the > generic > > > >>>>>>> interface design, good to know it will address extensibility. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>>>> Yufei > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On 2021/11/10 02:51:55 Jingsong Li wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> Hi everyone, > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for all the feedback so far. Based on the discussion[1] > > we > > > >>>>> seem > > > >>>>>>>> to have consensus, so I would like to start a vote on FLIP-188 > > for > > > >>>>>>>> which the FLIP has now also been updated[2]. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> The vote will last for at least 72 hours (Nov 13th 3:00 GMT) > > unless > > > >>>>>>>> there is an objection or insufficient votes. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> [1] > > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tqyn1cro5ohl3c3fkjb1zvxbo03sofn7 > > > >>>>>>>> [2] > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-188%3A+Introduce+Built-in+Dynamic+Table+Storage > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>>> Jingsong > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> Best, Jingsong Lee > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best, Jingsong Lee > > >
