Re: [VOTE] FLIP-158: Generalized incremental checkpoints

2021-02-10 Thread Roman Khachatryan
+1 from myself (binding). As there were no vetoes in more than 72hrs and three binding +1 the FLIP is now accepted. Thanks! Regards, Roman On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 8:35 AM Arvid Heise wrote: > FLIP looks good to me. +1 > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 8:00 AM Piotr Nowojski > wrote: > > > I'm carry

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-158: Generalized incremental checkpoints

2021-02-02 Thread Arvid Heise
FLIP looks good to me. +1 On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 8:00 AM Piotr Nowojski wrote: > I'm carrying over my +1 from the discussion thread. > > Piotrek > > śr., 3 lut 2021 o 05:55 Yuan Mei napisał(a): > > > As aforementioned in the discussion thread, +1 on this Flip vote. > > > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 a

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-158: Generalized incremental checkpoints

2021-02-02 Thread Piotr Nowojski
I'm carrying over my +1 from the discussion thread. Piotrek śr., 3 lut 2021 o 05:55 Yuan Mei napisał(a): > As aforementioned in the discussion thread, +1 on this Flip vote. > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:36 AM Khachatryan Roman < > khachatryan.ro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-158: Generalized incremental checkpoints

2021-02-02 Thread Yuan Mei
As aforementioned in the discussion thread, +1 on this Flip vote. On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:36 AM Khachatryan Roman < khachatryan.ro...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-158 [1] which was discussed in [2]. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless

[VOTE] FLIP-158: Generalized incremental checkpoints

2021-02-02 Thread Khachatryan Roman
Hi everyone, I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-158 [1] which was discussed in [2]. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless there are any objections, I'll close it by February 5, 2021 if we have received sufficient votes. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-158%3