+1 from myself (binding). As there were no vetoes in more than 72hrs and three binding +1 the FLIP is now accepted.
Thanks! Regards, Roman On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 8:35 AM Arvid Heise <ar...@apache.org> wrote: > FLIP looks good to me. +1 > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 8:00 AM Piotr Nowojski <pnowoj...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > I'm carrying over my +1 from the discussion thread. > > > > Piotrek > > > > śr., 3 lut 2021 o 05:55 Yuan Mei <yuanmei.w...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > > > > > As aforementioned in the discussion thread, +1 on this Flip vote. > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:36 AM Khachatryan Roman < > > > khachatryan.ro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-158 [1] which was discussed in [2]. > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless there are any > > > > objections, > > > > I'll close it by February 5, 2021 if we have received sufficient > votes. > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-158%3A+Generalized+incremental+checkpoints > > > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-158-Generalized-incremental-checkpoints-td47902.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Roman > > > > > > > > > >
