Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

Cool! Thanks all. I'll trigger the next RC in the next few hours. On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Fabian Hueske wrote: > FLINK-6652 is fixed. > > 2017-06-20 15:00 GMT+02:00 jincheng sun : > > > Hi @Robert, FLINK-6886 is merged. > > > > Cheers, > > SunJincheng > > > > 2017-06-20 20:49 GMT+08:00

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

FLINK-6652 is fixed. 2017-06-20 15:00 GMT+02:00 jincheng sun : > Hi @Robert, FLINK-6886 is merged. > > Cheers, > SunJincheng > > 2017-06-20 20:49 GMT+08:00 Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai : > > > FLINK-6921 and FLINK-6948 has been merged for 1.3.1. > > RC2 is good to go on my side! > > > > Best, > > Gordon >

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

Hi @Robert, FLINK-6886 is merged. Cheers, SunJincheng 2017-06-20 20:49 GMT+08:00 Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai : > FLINK-6921 and FLINK-6948 has been merged for 1.3.1. > RC2 is good to go on my side! > > Best, > Gordon > > > On 20 June 2017 at 8:44:33 PM, Timo Walther (twal...@apache.org) wrote: > > FLINK

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

I have one more commit for FLINK-6652. Chesnay gave it a look and I'm addressing the feedback right now. 2017-06-20 14:49 GMT+02:00 Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai : > FLINK-6921 and FLINK-6948 has been merged for 1.3.1. > RC2 is good to go on my side! > > Best, > Gordon > > > On 20 June 2017 at 8:44:33 PM,

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

FLINK-6921 and FLINK-6948 has been merged for 1.3.1. RC2 is good to go on my side! Best, Gordon On 20 June 2017 at 8:44:33 PM, Timo Walther (twal...@apache.org) wrote: FLINK-6881 and FLINK-6896 are merged. The Table API is ready for a new RC. Timo Am 19.06.17 um 17:00 schrieb jincheng sun

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

FLINK-6881 and FLINK-6896 are merged. The Table API is ready for a new RC. Timo Am 19.06.17 um 17:00 schrieb jincheng sun: Thanks @Timo! 2017-06-19 22:02 GMT+08:00 Timo Walther : I'm working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6896 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

If somebody has some spare time, it would be great to get a review for a fix for the DelimitedInputFormat (FLINK-6652 / PR #4088). 2017-06-19 17:00 GMT+02:00 jincheng sun : > Thanks @Timo! > > 2017-06-19 22:02 GMT+08:00 Timo Walther : > > > I'm working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLI

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

Thanks @Timo! 2017-06-19 22:02 GMT+08:00 Timo Walther : > I'm working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6896 and > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6881. I try to open a PR for > both today. > > Timo > > > Am 19.06.17 um 14:54 schrieb Robert Metzger: > > Fabian and SunJinc

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

I'm working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6896 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6881. I try to open a PR for both today. Timo Am 19.06.17 um 14:54 schrieb Robert Metzger: Fabian and SunJincheng, it looks like we are cancelling the 1.3.1 RC1. So there is the op

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

Fabian and SunJincheng, it looks like we are cancelling the 1.3.1 RC1. So there is the opportunity to get the two mentioned JIRAs in. On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Robert Metzger wrote: > I've closed my emails, so I didn't see your messages anymore Fabian. > The RC1 for 1.3.1 is out now. I pe

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

I've closed my emails, so I didn't see your messages anymore Fabian. The RC1 for 1.3.1 is out now. I personally think we should not cancel it because of these two issues. If we find more stuff we can do it, but I would like to push out 1.3.1 soon to make the ES5 connector and the fixes to the state

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

Hi @Robert, I agree with @Fabian. And thanks for review those PRs. @Fabian. Cheers, SunJincheng 2017-06-14 16:53 GMT+08:00 Fabian Hueske : > I don't think that > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6886 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6896 > > are blockers but it would be

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

I don't think that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6886 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6896 are blockers but it would be good to include them. I'll try to review the PRs today and merge them. Cheers, Fabian 2017-06-13 11:48 GMT+02:00 Till Rohrmann : > I've just merged

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

I looks like all blockers for the 1.3.1 release have been merged. I'll now create the RC for it. I think we need to get the RC out asap. Many users complained about the missing elasticsearch5 connector. On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Till Rohrmann wrote: > I've just merged the fix for this

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

I've just merged the fix for this blocker (FLINK-6685). On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > A quick Jira search reveals one blocker: https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/browse/FLINK-6685?filter=12334772&jql=project%20%3D% > 20FLINK%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20r

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

A quick Jira search reveals one blocker: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6685?filter=12334772&jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20affectedVersion%20%3D%201.3.0

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

I would like to include FLINK-6898 and FLINK-6900 in 1.3.1. They are related to the metric system, and limit the size of individual metric name components as the default window operator names are so long they were causing issues with file-system based storages because the components exceeded 2

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

Hi Robert, From user mail-list I find 2 bugs as follows: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6886 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6896 I'm not sure if they are as the release blocker. But I think is better to merged those two PR. into 1.3.1 release. What do you think? @Fabi

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

I’ve just merged the last blockers for 1.3.1. IMO, the release process for 1.3.1 is ready for kick off. On 8 June 2017 at 10:32:47 AM, Aljoscha Krettek (aljos...@apache.org) wrote: Yes, there is a workaround, as mentioned in the other thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eb7e256146fbe0

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

Yes, there is a workaround, as mentioned in the other thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eb7e256146fbe069a4210e1690fac5d3453208fab61515ab1a2f6bf7@%3Cuser.flink.apache.org%3E

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

There should be an easy work-around for this problem. Start a standalone cluster and run the queries against this cluster. But I also see that it might be annoying for users who used to do it differently. The basic question here should be whether we want the users to use the LocalFlinkMiniCluster i

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

I would also like to raise another potential blocker: it’s currently not easily possible for users to start a job in local mode in the IDE and to then interact with that cluster, say for experimenting with queryable state. At least one user walked into this problem already with the 1.3.0 RC: ht

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

>From the list [1], not many of the JIRAs have been fixed. I think it would be nice to put the RC for 1.3.1 out this week, given that multiple users have complained about some issues in the 1.3.0 release. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=labels%20%3D%20flink-rel-1.3.1-blockers On

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

After an offline discussion with Till, we decided to not include FLINK-6763 and FLINK-6764 as blockers for 1.3.1, and only merge them for 1.4.0 since they change serialization formats for checkpoints. In turn, I’ve included https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6804 as a 1.3.1 blocker.

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

while fixing build issues - what about FLINK-6654? On Friday, 2 June 2017 11:05:34 CEST Robert Metzger wrote: > Hi devs, > > I would like to release Apache Flink 1.3.1 with the following fixes: > > - FLINK-6812 Elasticsearch 5 release artifacts not published to Maven > central > - FLINK-6783 Wro

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

I don't know for sure. Stephan worked on this feature. I think the behavior / log messages are misleading and confusing right now. On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai wrote: > Should https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6643 (Flink restarts > job in HA even if NoRestartSt

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

Should https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6643 (Flink restarts job in HA even if NoRestartStrategy is set) also be included? On 2 June 2017 at 11:21:33 AM, Robert Metzger (rmetz...@apache.org) wrote: I agree with both! I've attached a label to all JIRAs for the 1.3.1 release. Once t

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

I agree with both! I've attached a label to all JIRAs for the 1.3.1 release. Once this list has 0 open issues, I'll create 1.3.1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=labels%20%3D%20flink-rel-1.3.1-blockers On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Chesnay Schepler wrote: > We should give a good e

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

We should give a good error message when the state migration fails as described in FLINK-6742. On 02.06.2017 11:05, Robert Metzger wrote: Hi devs, I would like to release Apache Flink 1.3.1 with the following fixes: - FLINK-6812 Elasticsearch 5 release artifacts not published to Maven central

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

Thanks for starting the discussion, Robert. IMO, we should also include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6772  (Incorrect ordering of matched state events in Flink CEP). Cheers, Gordon On 2 June 2017 at 11:06:02 AM, Robert Metzger (rmetz...@apache.org) wrote: Hi devs, I would like

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Flink 1.3.1

Hi devs, I would like to release Apache Flink 1.3.1 with the following fixes: - FLINK-6812 Elasticsearch 5 release artifacts not published to Maven central - FLINK-6783 Wrongly extracted TypeInformations for WindowedStream::aggregate - FLINK-6780 ExternalTableSource should add time attributes in