FLINK-6652 is fixed. 2017-06-20 15:00 GMT+02:00 jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com>:
> Hi @Robert, FLINK-6886 is merged. > > Cheers, > SunJincheng > > 2017-06-20 20:49 GMT+08:00 Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org>: > > > FLINK-6921 and FLINK-6948 has been merged for 1.3.1. > > RC2 is good to go on my side! > > > > Best, > > Gordon > > > > > > On 20 June 2017 at 8:44:33 PM, Timo Walther (twal...@apache.org) wrote: > > > > FLINK-6881 and FLINK-6896 are merged. The Table API is ready for a new > RC. > > > > Timo > > > > Am 19.06.17 um 17:00 schrieb jincheng sun: > > > Thanks @Timo! > > > > > > 2017-06-19 22:02 GMT+08:00 Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org>: > > > > > >> I'm working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6896 and > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6881. I try to open a PR > > for > > >> both today. > > >> > > >> Timo > > >> > > >> > > >> Am 19.06.17 um 14:54 schrieb Robert Metzger: > > >> > > >> Fabian and SunJincheng, it looks like we are cancelling the 1.3.1 RC1. > > >>> So there is the opportunity to get the two mentioned JIRAs in. > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org > > > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> I've closed my emails, so I didn't see your messages anymore Fabian. > > >>>> The RC1 for 1.3.1 is out now. I personally think we should not > cancel > > it > > >>>> because of these two issues. > > >>>> If we find more stuff we can do it, but I would like to push out > 1.3.1 > > >>>> soon to make the ES5 connector and the fixes to the state > descriptors > > >>>> available. > > >>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:22 AM, jincheng sun < > > sunjincheng...@gmail.com > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Hi @Robert, > > >>>>> I agree with @Fabian. > > >>>>> And thanks for review those PRs. @Fabian. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>> SunJincheng > > >>>>> > > >>>>> 2017-06-14 16:53 GMT+08:00 Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com>: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I don't think that > > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6886 > > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6896 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> are blockers but it would be good to include them. > > >>>>>> I'll try to review the PRs today and merge them. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Cheers, Fabian > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> 2017-06-13 11:48 GMT+02:00 Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I've just merged the fix for this blocker (FLINK-6685). > > >>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Aljoscha Krettek < > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> aljos...@apache.org> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> A quick Jira search reveals one blocker: > > https://issues.apache.org/ > > >>>>>>>> jira/browse/FLINK-6685?filter=12334772&jql=project%20%3D% > > >>>>>>>> 20FLINK%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND% > > 20resolution%20%3D% > > >>>>>>>> 20Unresolved%20AND%20affectedVersion%20%3D%201.3.0 < > > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6685?filter= > > >>>>>>>> 12334772&jql=project%20=%20FLINK%20AND%20priority%20=% > > >>>>>>>> 20Blocker%20AND%20resolution%20=%20Unresolved%20AND% > > >>>>>>>> 20affectedVersion%20=%201.3.0> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On 13. Jun 2017, at 10:12, Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org > > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> I would like to include FLINK-6898 and FLINK-6900 in 1.3.1. > > >>>>>>>>> They are related to the metric system, and limit the size of > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> individual > > >>>>>>> metric name components > > >>>>>>>>> as the default window operator names are so long they were > > causing > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> issues with file-system based > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> storages because the components exceeded 255 characters. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> They both have open PRs and change 1 and 3 lines respectively, > so > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> it's > > >>>>>>> very fast to review. > > >>>>>>>>> On 13.06.2017 09:33, jincheng sun wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Robert, > > >>>>>>>>>> From user mail-list I find 2 bugs as follows: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6886 > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6896 > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure if they are as the release blocker. But I think > is > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> better > > >>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>> merged those two PR. into 1.3.1 release. > > >>>>>>>>>> What do you think? @Fabian, @Timo, @Robert > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>>>> SunJincheng > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> 2017-06-13 14:03 GMT+08:00 Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai < > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org > > >>>>>> : > > >>>>>>>> I’ve just merged the last blockers for 1.3.1. IMO, the release > > >>>>>>>>>> process > > >>>>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> 1.3.1 is ready for kick off. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On 8 June 2017 at 10:32:47 AM, Aljoscha Krettek ( > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> aljos...@apache.org > > >>>>>>> ) > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> Yes, there is a workaround, as mentioned in the other thread: > > >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> eb7e256146fbe069a4210e1690fac5 > > >>>>>>> d3453208fab61515ab1a2f6bf7@%3Cuser.flink.apache.org%3E < > > >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> eb7e256146fbe069a4210e1690fac5 > > >>>>>>> d3453208fab61515ab1a2f6bf7@%3Cuser.flink.apache.org%3E>. It’s > > >>>>>>>>>> just a > > >>>>>>> bit > > >>>>>>>>> cumbersome but I agree that it’s not a blocker now. > > >>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>>>>> Aljoscha > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 8. Jun 2017, at 09:47, Till Rohrmann < > trohrm...@apache.org > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> There should be an easy work-around for this problem. Start a > > >>>>>>>>>>> standalone > > >>>>>>>>> cluster and run the queries against this cluster. But I also > > >>>>>>>>>>> see > > >>>>>> that > > >>>>>>>> it > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> might be annoying for users who used to do it differently. The > > >>>>>>>>>>> basic > > >>>>>>> question here should be whether we want the users to use the > > >>>>>>>>>>>> LocalFlinkMiniCluster in a remote setting (running queries > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> against > > >>>>>> it > > >>>>>>>> from > > >>>>>>>>>>>> a different process). > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Aljoscha Krettek < > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> aljos...@apache.org > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I would also like to raise another potential blocker: it’s > > >>>>>>>>>>>> currently > > >>>>>>>> not > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> easily possible for users to start a job in local mode in the > > >>>>>>>>>>>> IDE > > >>>>>> and to > > >>>>>>>>> then interact with that cluster, say for experimenting with > > >>>>>>>>>>>> queryable > > >>>>>>>> state. At least one user walked into this problem already with > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>> 1.3.0 > > >>>>>>>>> RC: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ > > >>>>>>>>>>>> eb7e256146fbe069a4210e1690fac5 > > >>>>>>>>> d3453208fab61515ab1a2f6bf7@%3Cuser.flink.apache.org%3E < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> eb7e256146fbe069a4210e1690fac5 > > >>>>>>>> d3453208fab61515ab1a2f6bf7@%3Cuser.flink.apache.org%3E> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The reasons I have so far analysed are: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * the local flink cluster starts with HAServices that don’t > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> allow > > >>>>>> external querying, by default. (Broadly spoken) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * the queryable state server is not started in the local > > flink > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> mini > > >>>>>>> cluster anymore and it cannot be configured to do so easily > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Aljoscha > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7. Jun 2017, at 11:54, Robert Metzger < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> rmetz...@apache.org> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> From the list [1], not many of the JIRAs have been fixed. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it would be nice to put the RC for 1.3.1 out this > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> week, > > >>>>>> given > > >>>>>>>>> that > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> multiple users have complained about some issues in the > > 1.3.0 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> release. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=labels%20%3D% > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 20flink-rel-1.3.1-blockers > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> After an offline discussion with Till, we decided to not > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> include > > >>>>>>> FLINK-6763 and FLINK-6764 as blockers for 1.3.1, and only > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge > > >>>>>> them > > >>>>>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.4.0 since they change serialization formats for > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> checkpoints. > > >>>>>> In turn, I’ve included https://issues.apache.org/ > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> jira/browse/FLINK-6804 > > >>>>>>>>>>>> as > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a 1.3.1 blocker. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 June 2017 at 5:27:18 PM, Nico Kruber ( > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> n...@data-artisans.com) > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> while fixing build issues - what about FLINK-6654? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 2 June 2017 11:05:34 CEST Robert Metzger > wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi devs, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to release Apache Flink 1.3.1 with the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following > > >>>>>> fixes: > > >>>>>>>>> - FLINK-6812 Elasticsearch 5 release artifacts not > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published > > >>>>>> to > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Maven > > >>>>>>>>> central > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-6783 Wrongly extracted TypeInformations for > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WindowedStream::aggregate > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-6780 ExternalTableSource should add time > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attributes in > > >>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>> row > > >>>>>>>>>>>> type > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-6775 StateDescriptor cannot be shared by > multiple > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subtasks > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-6763 Inefficient PojoSerializerConfigSnapshot > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serialization > > >>>>>>>>> format > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-6764 Deduplicate stateless TypeSerializers when > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serializing > > >>>>>>>>> composite TypeSerializers > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there anything else that we need to wait for before > we > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote > > >>>>>> on > > >>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> first > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >
