Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-77: Introduce ConfigOptions with Data Types

2019-10-15 Thread Dawid Wysakowicz
Good idea Aljosha, I will kick off a voting thread shortly as there were no comments in this thread so far, so I would assume there are no objections ;) Best, Dawid On 15/10/2019 09:21, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > This looks very slim now! If there are no objections on this I would propose > we q

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-77: Introduce ConfigOptions with Data Types

2019-10-15 Thread Aljoscha Krettek
This looks very slim now! If there are no objections on this I would propose we quickly move on to a VOTE thread. Best, Aljoscha > On 11. Oct 2019, at 10:35, Timo Walther wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > as mentioned in the [DISCUSS] thread of FLIP-54 [1]. The evolution of > ConfigOption is a ver

[DISCUSS] FLIP-77: Introduce ConfigOptions with Data Types

2019-10-11 Thread Timo Walther
Hi everyone, as mentioned in the [DISCUSS] thread of FLIP-54 [1]. The evolution of ConfigOption is a very sensitive topic that touches many implementers. We will therefore discard FLIP-54 and split it into several discussions and FLIPs. We propose FLIP-77 for introducing ConfigOptions with D