Good idea Aljosha, I will kick off a voting thread shortly as there were no comments in this thread so far, so I would assume there are no objections ;)
Best, Dawid On 15/10/2019 09:21, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > This looks very slim now! If there are no objections on this I would propose > we quickly move on to a VOTE thread. > > Best, > Aljoscha > >> On 11. Oct 2019, at 10:35, Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> as mentioned in the [DISCUSS] thread of FLIP-54 [1]. The evolution of >> ConfigOption is a very sensitive topic that touches many implementers. We >> will therefore discard FLIP-54 and split it into several discussions and >> FLIPs. >> >> We propose FLIP-77 for introducing ConfigOptions with Data Types: >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-77%3A+Introduce+ConfigOptions+with+Data+Types >> >> Compared to the data types in FLIP-77, it excludes a class type and struct >> type. >> >> Happy to hear your opinion. >> >> Regards, >> Timo >> >> [1] >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b36d02c8065d7767c393597c61a4fe55b6bd302b166890b6d978d9e5@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E >>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
