+1 for deprecating
2015-03-11 14:11 GMT+01:00 Kostas Tzoumas :
> +1 for deprecating and pointing people to Gelly
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
>
> >
> > On 10 Mar 2015, at 22:02, Vasiliki Kalavri
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I would like your opinion on wh
Hi all,
I would like your opinion on whether we should deprecate the Spargel API in
0.9.
Gelly doesn't depend on Spargel, it actually contains it -- we have copied
the relevant classes over. I think it would be a good idea to deprecate
Spargel in 0.9, so that we can inform existing Spargel users
Thanks for the input everyone!
If no objections, I will open an issue for deprecating the Spargel API
tomorrow.
Cheers,
V.
On 11 March 2015 at 15:59, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> +1 for deprecating
>
> 2015-03-11 14:11 GMT+01:00 Kostas Tzoumas :
>
> > +1 for deprecating and pointing people to Gelly
>
+1 for deprecating and pointing people to Gelly
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
>
> On 10 Mar 2015, at 22:02, Vasiliki Kalavri
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like your opinion on whether we should deprecate the Spargel API
> in
> > 0.9.
> >
> > Gelly doesn't depend
On 10 Mar 2015, at 22:02, Vasiliki Kalavri wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like your opinion on whether we should deprecate the Spargel API in
> 0.9.
>
> Gelly doesn't depend on Spargel, it actually contains it -- we have copied
> the relevant classes over. I think it would be a good idea to depr
+1
2015-03-11 9:41 GMT+01:00 Till Rohrmann :
> If Spargel's functionality is a subset of Gelly, I'm also in favor of a
> deprecation. This will direct new users directly to Gelly and gives old
> ones time to adapt their code.
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Henry Saputra
> wrote:
>
> > Than
If Spargel's functionality is a subset of Gelly, I'm also in favor of a
deprecation. This will direct new users directly to Gelly and gives old
ones time to adapt their code.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Henry Saputra
wrote:
> Thanks for bringing up for discussion, Vasia
>
>
> I am +1 for de
Thanks for bringing up for discussion, Vasia
I am +1 for deprecating Spargel for 0.9 release.
It is confusing for new comer (well even for me) to Flink and found
out there are 2 sets of Graph APIs.
We could use 0.9 release as stabilization period for Gelly, which is
why Spargel is deprecated an
Big +1 for deprecating Spargel :D
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like your opinion on whether we should deprecate the Spargel API in
> 0.9.
>
> Gelly doesn't depend on Spargel, it actually contains it -- we have copied
