Big +1 for deprecating Spargel :D On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri < vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > > I would like your opinion on whether we should deprecate the Spargel API in > 0.9. > > Gelly doesn't depend on Spargel, it actually contains it -- we have copied > the relevant classes over. I think it would be a good idea to deprecate > Spargel in 0.9, so that we can inform existing Spargel users that we'll > eventually remove it. > > Also, I think the fact that we have 2 Graph APIs in the documentation might > be a bit confusing for newcomers. One might wonder why do we have them both > and when shall they use one over the other? > > It might be a good idea to add a note in the Spargel guide that would > suggest to use Gelly instead and a corresponding note in the beginning of > the Gelly guide to explain that Spargel is part of Gelly now. Or maybe a > "Gelly or Spargel?" section. What do you think? > > The only thing that worries me is that the Gelly API is not very stable. Of > course, we are mostly adding things, but we are planning to make some > changes as well and I'm sure more will be needed the more we use it. > > Looking forward to your thoughts! > > Cheers, > Vasia. >
