For those that are interested, I have a draft PR open for this
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/21128 - Feel free to have a look.
I'm not sure yet why the Flink CI fails, since these tests are passing
locally.
Thanks,
Martijn
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 10:21 AM Matthias Pohl
wrote:
> > Addit
> Additionally, having code that hasn't been touch for a while increases
the risk of it
Sorry about this incomplete confusing sentence. I was about to remove it
when accidentally pushing the shortcut for sending the message out to the
mailing list.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 10:18 AM Matthias Pohl
w
I guess upgrading the minimal version should also mean cleaning up the
codebase, i.e. removing code segments that have been around to allow
support for older versions. The overall goal should be to improve the Flink
codebase in my opinion. Considering what David said in the old thread about
Hadoop
I believe there are some reflection based approaches in the `flink-yarn`
module, for supporting outdated APIs in early Hadoop versions.
I haven't done a thorough check, and these are what I get.
- AMRMClientAsyncReflector
- ApplicationSubmissionContextReflector
- ContainerRequestReflector
- Regist
Given that we do not bundle any hadoop classes in the Flink binary, do you
mean simply bump the hadoop version in the parent pom?
If it is, why do not we use the latest stable hadoop version 3.3.4? It
seems that our cron build has verified that hadoop3 could work.
Best,
Yang
David Morávek 于2022年
+1; anything below 2.10.x seems to be EOL
Best,
D.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 10:48 AM Márton Balassi
wrote:
> Hi Martjin,
>
> +1 for 2.10.2. Do you expect to have bandwidth in the near term to
> implement the bump?
>
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 5:00 PM Gabor Somogyi
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Martin,
> >
>
Hi Martjin,
+1 for 2.10.2. Do you expect to have bandwidth in the near term to
implement the bump?
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 5:00 PM Gabor Somogyi
wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Thanks for bringing this up! Lately I was thinking about to bump the hadoop
> version to at least 2.6.1 to clean up issues like
Hi Martin,
Thanks for bringing this up! Lately I was thinking about to bump the hadoop
version to at least 2.6.1 to clean up issues like this:
https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/8d05393f5bcc0a917b2dab3fe81a58acaccabf13/flink-filesystems/flink-hadoop-fs/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/util
Hi everyone,
Little over a year ago a discussion thread was opened on changing the
minimal supported version of Hadoop and bringing that to 2.8.5. [1] In this
discussion thread, I would like to propose to bring that minimal supported
version of Hadoop to 2.10.2.
Hadoop 2.8.5 is vulnerable for mul
