Hi Martjin,

+1 for 2.10.2. Do you expect to have bandwidth in the near term to
implement the bump?

On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 5:00 PM Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somo...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Martin,
>
> Thanks for bringing this up! Lately I was thinking about to bump the hadoop
> version to at least 2.6.1 to clean up issues like this:
>
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/8d05393f5bcc0a917b2dab3fe81a58acaccabf13/flink-filesystems/flink-hadoop-fs/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/util/HadoopUtils.java#L157-L159
>
> All in all +1 from my perspective.
>
> Just a question here. Are we stating the minimum Hadoop version for users
> somewhere in the doc or they need to find it out from source code like
> this?
>
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/3a4c11371e6f2aacd641d86c1d5b4fd86435f802/tools/azure-pipelines/build-apache-repo.yml#L113
>
> BR,
> G
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 5:02 AM Martijn Visser <martijnvis...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Little over a year ago a discussion thread was opened on changing the
> > minimal supported version of Hadoop and bringing that to 2.8.5. [1] In
> this
> > discussion thread, I would like to propose to bring that minimal
> supported
> > version of Hadoop to 2.10.2.
> >
> > Hadoop 2.8.5 is vulnerable for multiple CVEs which are classified as
> > Critical. [2] [3]. While Flink is not directly impacted by those, we do
> see
> > vulnerability scanners flag Flink as being vulnerable. We could easily
> > mitigate that by bumping the minimal supported version of Hadoop to
> 2.10.2.
> >
> > I'm looking forward to your opinions on this topic.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Martijn
> > https://twitter.com/MartijnVisser82
> > https://github.com/MartijnVisser
> >
> > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/81fhnwfxomjhyy59f9bbofk9rxpdxjo5
> > [2] https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-25168
> > [3] https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-26612
> >
>

Reply via email to