Hi Martjin, +1 for 2.10.2. Do you expect to have bandwidth in the near term to implement the bump?
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 5:00 PM Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Martin, > > Thanks for bringing this up! Lately I was thinking about to bump the hadoop > version to at least 2.6.1 to clean up issues like this: > > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/8d05393f5bcc0a917b2dab3fe81a58acaccabf13/flink-filesystems/flink-hadoop-fs/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/util/HadoopUtils.java#L157-L159 > > All in all +1 from my perspective. > > Just a question here. Are we stating the minimum Hadoop version for users > somewhere in the doc or they need to find it out from source code like > this? > > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/3a4c11371e6f2aacd641d86c1d5b4fd86435f802/tools/azure-pipelines/build-apache-repo.yml#L113 > > BR, > G > > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 5:02 AM Martijn Visser <martijnvis...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Little over a year ago a discussion thread was opened on changing the > > minimal supported version of Hadoop and bringing that to 2.8.5. [1] In > this > > discussion thread, I would like to propose to bring that minimal > supported > > version of Hadoop to 2.10.2. > > > > Hadoop 2.8.5 is vulnerable for multiple CVEs which are classified as > > Critical. [2] [3]. While Flink is not directly impacted by those, we do > see > > vulnerability scanners flag Flink as being vulnerable. We could easily > > mitigate that by bumping the minimal supported version of Hadoop to > 2.10.2. > > > > I'm looking forward to your opinions on this topic. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Martijn > > https://twitter.com/MartijnVisser82 > > https://github.com/MartijnVisser > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/81fhnwfxomjhyy59f9bbofk9rxpdxjo5 > > [2] https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-25168 > > [3] https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-26612 > > >
