Hi Mayank,
Thank you for starting the discussion! In general, I think such functionality
would be a really great addition to Flink.
Could you pls. elaborate a bit more one what is the reason of defining a
`connection` resource on the database level instead of the catalog level?
If I think about `
+1 (non-binding)
- verified signature and hashes
- checked no binaries in source release
- checked staging repository
- reviewed Jira release notes
- verified GH tag
- reviewed web PR
Thanks,
Ferenc
On Thursday, May 1st, 2025 at 04:38, Xiqian YU wrote:
>
>
> Thanks Kunni for preparing this
Martijn Visser created FLINK-37753:
--
Summary: Improve error handling for UNIX_TIMESTAMP
Key: FLINK-37753
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37753
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Imp
+1 (binding)
Thanks for driving this!
Best,
Ferenc
On Tuesday, April 29th, 2025 at 10:40, David Radley
wrote:
>
>
> As below – starting a new vote thread (thanks @Robert
> Metzgermailto:rmetz...@apache.org).
>
>
> I'd like to start a vote for FLIP-518: Introduce a community review
> p
Hi Aihua,
We planning to support Variant shredding soon after we support the
basis variant encoding as stated in the Future Work section of the
FLIP.
Best,
Xuannan
On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 1:43 PM Aihua Xu wrote:
>
> Hi Xuannan,
>
> Are we planning to support Variant shredding in the future or ju
Hi,
I assume we are not removing the original syntax (I guess we could deprecate it
to show our intent to remove it – that is what we want to do ) , but
effectively aliasing it with the new more user friendly syntax.
Kind regards, David.
From: Martijn Visser
Date: Tuesday, 29 April 2025 a
Hi,
A friendly nudge, please could you vote for this so we can move forward. I
cannot see any downside to adding this, but am open to feedback,
Kind regards, David.
From: David Radley
Date: Tuesday, 29 April 2025 at 09:42
To: Robert Metzger , dev@flink.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [VOTE]
