Hi, A friendly nudge, please could you vote for this so we can move forward. I cannot see any downside to adding this, but am open to feedback,
Kind regards, David. From: David Radley <david_rad...@uk.ibm.com> Date: Tuesday, 29 April 2025 at 09:42 To: Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>, dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [VOTE] FLIP-518: Introduce a community review process As below – starting a new vote thread (thanks @Robert Metzger<mailto:rmetz...@apache.org>). I'd like to start a vote for FLIP-518: Introduce a community review process [1] which has been discussed in this thread [2]. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an objection or not enough votes. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-518%3A+Introduce+a+community+review+process [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/cgw3m1z7v1f0o3snygkrj43mn5b00ovh Kind regards, David. From: Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> Date: Monday, 28 April 2025 at 06:05 To: David Radley <david_rad...@uk.ibm.com> Cc: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org>, Tom Cooper <c...@tomcooper.dev> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] FLIP-518: Introduce a community review process Thanks for starting the vote David. It seems that you've replied to the [DISCUSS] thread (but you've changed the subject). However, at least the gmail threading feature is representing this email under the [DISCUSS] subject, not a new [VOTE] subject. My concern is that people will not see this thread. Can you create a new [VOTE] email (thread ;) ) to make sure this gets enough attention? On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 12:54 PM David Radley <david_rad...@uk.ibm.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks @Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> . I have tweaked the words > in the Flip to say GitHub Action - which is the correct technical term for > what I was previously called git action. Thanks @Tom Cooper > <c...@tomcooper.dev> for pointing this out. > > > > I'd like to start a vote for FLIP-518: Introduce a community review > process [1] which has been discussed in this thread [2]. The vote will be > open for at least 72 hours unless there is an objection or not enough > votes. > > > > [1] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-518%3A+Introduce+a+community+review+process > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/cgw3m1z7v1f0o3snygkrj43mn5b00ovh > > > > Kind regards, David. > > > > *From: *Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> > *Date: *Thursday, 24 April 2025 at 08:22 > *To: *dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org> > *Cc: *Sebastien Pereira <spere...@fr.ibm.com> > *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-518: Introduce a community > review process > > Awesome, thanks a lot. > > I'm +1 on putting this FLIP for a VOTE. > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 10:49 PM David Radley <david_rad...@uk.ibm.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Seb and Robert, > > Thanks for your feedback I have taken it on board, and have amended the > > Flip[1] to be a Git action that will automatically set and remove the > > labels. See the updated text and flow diagram in the flip for details, > > Kind regards, David. > > > > [1] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-518%3A+Introduce+a+community+review+process > > > > > > From: Sebastien Pereira <spere...@fr.ibm.com> > > Date: Tuesday, 15 April 2025 at 15:18 > > To: David Radley <david_rad...@uk.ibm.com>, dev@flink.apache.org < > > dev@flink.apache.org> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-518: Introduce a community review process > > Hi David, > > > > Thanks for this. I could not find information about flinkbot, so I feel I > > am missing important pieces in FLIP-518 [1]. Is it an automated process > > that runs regularly and take actions given some rules, or is it a tool > that > > is manually triggered? > > > > If I am not mistaken, once a label is available/defined in a Github repo, > > any user could set it manually. I guess point 1 of Proposed Changed is > > going to explain when/who/what is supposed to set these labels? > > > > Regards, > > Sebastien Pereira > > > > [1] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-518%3A+Introduce+a+community+review+process > > > > > > --- > > > > > > On 21/03/2025, 16:31, "David Radley" <david_rad...@uk.ibm.com> wrote: > > I would like to start a discussion around FLIP-518< > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/_wuWF > which proposes a new > > community review process. Please let me know if you support this idea, or > > would like changes. > > > > We hope this process improvement will > > > > * Encourage more people in the community review PRs, by formally > > recognising reviews as contributions. > > * Reducing the workload on committers. > > * Reducing our technical backlog. > > > > > > Kind regards, David. > > > > Unless otherwise stated above: > > > > IBM United Kingdom Limited > > Registered in England and Wales with number 741598 > > Registered office: Building C, IBM Hursley Office, Hursley Park Road, > > Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2JN > > > > Unless otherwise stated above: > > > > IBM United Kingdom Limited > > Registered in England and Wales with number 741598 > > Registered office: Building C, IBM Hursley Office, Hursley Park Road, > > Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2JN > > > Unless otherwise stated above: > > IBM United Kingdom Limited > Registered in England and Wales with number 741598 > Registered office: Building C, IBM Hursley Office, Hursley Park Road, > Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2JN > Unless otherwise stated above: IBM United Kingdom Limited Registered in England and Wales with number 741598 Registered office: Building C, IBM Hursley Office, Hursley Park Road, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2JN Unless otherwise stated above: IBM United Kingdom Limited Registered in England and Wales with number 741598 Registered office: Building C, IBM Hursley Office, Hursley Park Road, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2JN
