Hi, Allison. Thanks for driving this FLIP.
I have some questions to confirm:
1. I can’t find any existed configuration name
`historyserver.archive.cached-retained-jobs`, I guess that what you mean is
modifing existing configuration from `historyserver.archive.retained-jobs`
to `historyserver.archi
+1 (non-binding)
Regards
Venkata krishnan
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 2:05 PM Weiqing Yang
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-497: Early Fire Support for Flink SQL
> Interval Join [1].
> The discussion thread can be found here [2].
>
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 h
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 3:02 PM Alan Sheinberg
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-498 [1]. It proposes exposing
> AsyncTableFunction as a proper user defined function. The type already
> exists for Lookup Joins, but isn't usable as other UDFs. This FLIP
Hi everyone,
Sorry for the delayed response! I appreciate the comments.
Addressing Timo's comments:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but for AggregateFunctions implementing a
> retract() and merge() is optional. How can a BundledAggregateFunction
> communicate whether or not this is supported to the
Hi everyone,
I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-498 [1]. It proposes exposing
AsyncTableFunction as a proper user defined function. The type already
exists for Lookup Joins, but isn't usable as other UDFs. This FLIP would
bring it up to parity with others. It has been discussed in this thread [2].
Hi all,
The hints proposed in FLIP-313 can be added later if needed.
That sounds good. Will definitely take that as a followup task to
consider.
So I'm +1 to continue with this FLIP, unless there are objections from
> others?
Since it doesn't seem that there were any objections, I'm going to
Hi All,
I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-497: Early Fire Support for Flink SQL
Interval Join [1].
The discussion thread can be found here [2].
The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours unless there are objections
or insufficient votes.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/
Thank you all for reviewing. As there are no objections, I’ll move forward
with a vote.
Best regards,
Weiqing
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 9:30 AM Venkatakrishnan Sowrirajan
wrote:
> Same here, I don't have any more questions. Thanks!
>
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2025, 10:10 PM Xingcan Cui wrote:
>
> > Hi W
Yanquan Lv created FLINK-37231:
--
Summary: Add doc for newly added source metric statistics
Key: FLINK-37231
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37231
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Tech
Same here, I don't have any more questions. Thanks!
On Sat, Jan 25, 2025, 10:10 PM Xingcan Cui wrote:
> Hi Weiqing,
>
> I don't have any more questions. The doc looks good to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Xingcan
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 8:46 PM Venkatakrishnan Sowrirajan <
> vsowr...@asu.edu>
> wrote:
>
Ferenc Csaky created FLINK-37230:
Summary: Consolidate Kudu connector table options
Key: FLINK-37230
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37230
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvem
FYI: The nightly runs for 1.18 are deactivated in Azure and GHA
On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 1:02 PM Matthias Pohl wrote:
> Ok, thanks for your feedback. I will go ahead with disabling CI for 1.18
> next week if no other objections are shared.
>
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 5:21 PM Rui Fan <1996fan...@gma
12 matches
Mail list logo
