Hi kaibo,
I am really appreciated that you could share your use case.
As you say, our users in production also could be divided into two groups.
The common users have more knowledge about flink, they could use the
command line to submit job and debug job from logs of job manager and
taskmanager
Kurt Young created FLINK-13688:
--
Summary: HiveCatalogUseBlinkITCase.testBlinkUdf constantly failed
with 1.9.0-rc2
Key: FLINK-13688
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13688
Project: Flink
Kurt Young created FLINK-13687:
--
Summary: elasticsearch5.ElasticsearchSinkITCase constantly fail
with 1.9.0-rc2
Key: FLINK-13687
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13687
Project: Flink
Jark Wu created FLINK-13686:
---
Summary: Unstable download Kafka lead to Kafka e2e test failed
Key: FLINK-13686
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13686
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Hi Jeff,
Thank you for your attention. You are right, the design doc is out of date.
I will try to contact with Till and Sun Jin to get the edit permission. And
then update the design doc.
Currently we get the k8s cluster informations from the kube config file.
You may have multiple contexts in y
Hi Dev Team,
I am facing issue while registering flink version : 1.7.2 .
Go through the below link for all the details.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57431025/issue-while-registering-event-in-flink-cluster-1-7-2-version
[https://cdn.sstatic.net/Sites/stackoverflow/img/apple-touch-i...@2.pn
Hello,
We are using Apache Flink 1.7.2 version. During our security scans following
issues are reported by our scan tool. Please let us know your comments on these
issues.
[1] 150085 Slow HTTP POST vulnerability
Severity Potential Vulnerability - Level 3
Group Information Disclosure
Threat
The
Dear community,
happy to share this week's community update. The first real release
candidate of Apache Flink 1.9.0 has been published and the developer
community has moved more towards the 1.10 development cycle with more
discussion threads popping up again.
As always, please feel free to add ad
Hi Dev Team,
I am facing issue while registering flink version : 1.7.2 .
Go through the below link for all the details.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57431025/issue-while-registering-event-in-flink-cluster-1-7-2-version
[https://cdn.sstatic.net/Sites/stackoverflow/img/apple-touch-i...@2.pn
Hi again,
How do I build the RC locally with the hadoop version specified? Seems like
no matter what I do I run into dependency problems with the shaded hadoop
dependencies.
This seems to have worked in the past.
There might be some documentation somewhere that I couldnt find, so I would
apprecia
Hi!
I am trying to build 1.9.0-rc2 with the -Pvendor-repos profile enabled. I
get the following error:
mvn clean install -DskipTests -Pvendor-repos -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0
-Pinclude-hadoop (ignore that the hadoop version is not a vendor hadoop
version)
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project fl
Gyula Fora created FLINK-13685:
--
Summary: YARN deployment hangs when requested container is above
the maximum vcore size
Key: FLINK-13685
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13685
Project: F
Thank you all for the good discussion.
I was one of the folks that thinking about such a repository split together
with Chesnay, but due to lack of prior experience, happy to hear all the
points that
Let's investigate a bit what would be alternatives to this that solve the
two problems.
(1) B
I'm a bit late to the discussion here. Three suggestions:
1) Procedure for "insufficient active binding voters to reach 2/3 majority
> 1. Wait until the minimum length of the voting passes.
> 2. Publicly reach out to the remaining binding voters in the voting mail
> thread for at least 2
Apart from a technical explanation, the initial suggestion does not propose how
the repository should be split up. The only meaningful split I see is for the
connectors.
This discussion dates back a few years:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4ee502667a5801d23d76a01406e747e1a934417dc67ef7d2
Hi folks,
Thanks for all the discussion and support. I have started the voting thread.
http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Flink-Project-Bylaws-td31558.html
Thanks,
Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 2:56 PM Fabian Hueske wrote:
> Thanks for the upda
Hi all,
I would like to start a voting thread on the project bylaws of Flink. It
aims to help the community coordinate more smoothly. Please see the bylaws
wiki page below for details.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
The discussion thread is following:
17 matches
Mail list logo
