Can a PMC member please complete the following:
* svn move -m "Release Flink 1.5.6"
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.5.6-rc1
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/flink-1.5.6
* mark the 1.5.6 version in JIRA as released:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet
I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release.
There are 5 approving votes, 4 of which are binding:
* Chesnay Schepler (binding)
* Aljoscha Krettek (binding)
* Timo Walther (binding)
* Thomas Weise
* Till Rohrmann (binding)
There are no disapproving votes.
Thanks everyone!
Sure, we don't have to include it in the release notes but can simply add a
warning the 1.5 documentation.
The docs are not tied to a release.
Am Fr., 21. Dez. 2018 um 09:23 Uhr schrieb Chesnay Schepler <
ches...@apache.org>:
> I agree to not cancel the RC.
>
> At the end of the day 1.5 is no lon
|I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release.|
|There are 5 approving votes, 3 of which are binding:
* Hequn (non-binding)
* Timo (binding)
* Till (binding)
* jincheng (non-binding)
* Chesnay (binding)|
|There are no disapproving votes.|
|Thanks everyone!|
+1
On 16.12.2018 20:39, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
1.7.1, as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
The complete staging area is available for your
I agree to not cancel the RC.
At the end of the day 1.5 is no longer supported. All we're doing is
releasing the things we already merged to release-1.5;
I would prefer not opening the gates for additional back-ports.
I'm impartial to mentioning it in the release notes; why should we list
thi
Thanks for taking a look. Since the issue isn't a regression, my preference
would be to not block the release. I will keep the vote open till end of
today for more feedback.
In general what should we rely on when cutting an RC? That critical fixes
have been backported? Otherwise it would be necess
Add Dev Group
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 6:21 PM dhanuka ranasinghe <
dhanuka.priyan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have tried to read data from Kafka from Flink using Table API. It's
> working fine with Flink 1.4 but when upgrade to 1.7 given me below error. I
> have attached the libraries ad
blogpost: https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/142
On 16.12.2018 20:39, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
1.7.1, as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comment
I know, DataStreamUtils#reinterpretAsKeyedStream() is marked experimental, but
would you nevertheless consider the following issue a blocker?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10809
It has always been present since the introduction of
DataStreamUtils#reinterpretAsKeyedStream() and so fa
10 matches
Mail list logo
