Re: Hello Everyone

2015-05-09 Thread Lokesh Rajaram
Thank you for the reference links. Which approach should I take, casting or use scala methods. If it's the latter option will the JIRA ticket FLINK-1711 be updated to reflect it? Thanks, Lokesh On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Chiwan Park wrote:

Re: Hello Everyone

2015-05-09 Thread Chiwan Park
Hi. There is some problems using Guava’s check method in Scala. (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/guava-discuss/juwovq26R3k ) You can solve this error simply with casting last argument to java.lang.Object. But I think we’

Hello Everyone

2015-05-09 Thread Lokesh Rajaram
Hello All, I am new to Flink community and am very excited about the project and work you all have been doing. Kudos!! I was looking to pickup some starter task. Robert recommended to pick up https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1711. Thanks Robert for your guidance. Sorry for a dumb ques

Re: [DISCUSS] Naming and Functionality of Stream Operators and Tasks

2015-05-09 Thread Márton Balassi
Hi, I am in favor of removing the Stream (or Streaming) suffixes and prefixes. I think that Gyula was also referring to those. I think the naming of the Tasks, and user facing operators (SingleOutputStreamOperator and alike) are fine. As for the other bunch of Operators we could name them Driver

Re: [DISCUSS] Naming and Functionality of Stream Operators and Tasks

2015-05-09 Thread Aljoscha Krettek
Which name changes are you referring to? The proposed names in my recent PR? Or the dropping of Stream from all the classes. For the rest I was just rambling about how I don't like the names in the batch API. :D On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Gyula Fóra wrote: > Generally I am in favor of makin