RE : FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-14 Thread webdoublefx
Actually, that's a freshly compiled module with the debug flag set to true that I can debug in FB, so, I was wondering if FB has particularities I don't know while debuging, also, I found similar issues searching on google but none of them has a fix, any other thoughts ? Envoyé depuis un mobil

RE : RE : FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-14 Thread webdoublefx
11:26 AM, "webdoublefx" wrote: >Actually, that's a freshly compiled module with the debug flag set to >true that I can debug in FB, so, I was wondering if FB has >particularities I don't know while debuging, also, I found similar issues >searching on google but none

RE : Java 1.6

2014-01-21 Thread webdoublefx
Velocity is the only dependency have seen which made the build failed at the moment. @Carlos, what kind of impact could it be on client applications ? I can figure out some issues for FM / IDEs which uses the built java modules but not for client app. Envoyé depuis un mobile Samsung

RE : RE : Java 1.6

2014-01-21 Thread webdoublefx
2014/1/21 webdoublefx > Velocity is the only dependency have seen which made the build failed at > the moment. > > @Carlos, what kind of impact could it be on client applications ? I can > figure out some issues for FM / IDEs which uses the built java modules but > not for client

RE : Java 1.6

2014-01-21 Thread webdoublefx
I drop an email last week with stack trace, can repost tomorrow if needed Envoyé depuis un mobile Samsung Message d'origine De : Justin Mclean Date :21/01/2014 23:34 (GMT+00:00) A : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Java 1.6 Hi, I been compiling with Java 1.7 for about a y

RE : FDB has old code ?

2014-01-24 Thread webdoublefx
Thanks Scott for having tried :-) Btw Im sick today, will propably commit on sunday, the time to clean up things Envoyé depuis un mobile Samsung Message d'origine De : Scott Talsma Date :24/01/2014 14:26 (GMT+00:00) A : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: FDB has old code ?

RE : FLEX-34070

2014-02-06 Thread webdoublefx
Sorry, short answer because Im in roaming, I originaly put those files in the gitignore because they are generated and therefore it is logical to do so, this was at the start when we moved to git, Justin as RM was complaining about that for the same reasons he does today. @Maurice, this git com

RE : FLEX-34070

2014-02-06 Thread webdoublefx
Ps: Indeed if the file is modified localy, git wont conplain during the checkout :-) Envoyé depuis un mobile Samsung Message d'origine De : webdoublefx Date :06/02/2014 15:53 (GMT+00:00) A : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : RE : FLEX-34070 Sorry, short answer because

RE : [FDB] Integration

2014-05-27 Thread webdoublefx
Abobe still sells FB so Im not sure they really wanted to have the CLI version completely working, what Im sure instead as you may have noticed, is that it never been tested against workers. Happy to help if it can bring us complete integration in IntelliJ. Waiting for your feedback Envoyé de

RE : [Installer] Using Alchemy/CrossBridge in the Installer

2014-06-02 Thread webdoublefx
I just started today, so not sure Ill make it but was trying to make workers more friendly than what they are today, closer than what they are in Java, my goal was to continue what I wasnt able to finish before with the installer using workers and sub workers to download and computer the md5, I

RE : 4.12.2

2014-06-22 Thread webdoublefx
Alex, one question though, from the current xmls, it was supposed to be a 4.13, may be I didnt updated from a long time, but still, why this version number downgrade ? Envoyé depuis un mobile Samsung. Message d'origine De : Alex Harui Date :22/06/2014 16:38 (GMT+00:00) A

RE : Installer for SDK is currently broken due to change Adobe has made

2014-07-30 Thread webdoublefx
I havent got any computer in my hand but yes you can use some 4.6 flex sdk maven repo and get the artifact/md5 from it, someone can probably point u out the link Envoyé depuis un mobile Samsung. Message d'origine De : Justin Mclean Date :30/07/2014 9:03 AM (GMT+01:00) A :

RE : Falcon Antlr4 refactoring

2014-08-02 Thread webdoublefx
Sounds very promising, was you be able to run a swf built thru this new workflow already or is it still too much in early stage at the moment ? Envoyé depuis un mobile Samsung. Message d'origine De : Christofer Dutz Date :02/08/2014 7:16 PM (GMT+01:00) A : "'dev@flex.apach