I interpreted Luciano's -1 as a general "I am not in favour of this
proposal", which seems like a perfectly valid use. Even if it were being
cast _as_ a veto on some code change or other, I still think it would be
valid, as it comes with justification. (That other people might disagree
with that ju
Ross, agreed. A list of potential "gotchas" would be sensible!
On 27 April 2013 17:26, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Let me repeat again that the value I see in the Flex report is that it
> identifies some issues that projects moving to git should consider and plan
> for. This will make other projects
