I interpreted Luciano's -1 as a general "I am not in favour of this proposal", which seems like a perfectly valid use. Even if it were being cast _as_ a veto on some code change or other, I still think it would be valid, as it comes with justification. (That other people might disagree with that justification is neither here or there in terms of the efficacy of the veto.)
On 27 April 2013 11:55, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: > Luciano Resende wrote on Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:34:39 -0700: > > -1 for using Apache Flex's bad experience, as a concrete example, as this > > might give the wrong perception about Git at Apache. > > Sorry, invalid veto. You can't veto people from citing a datapoint > because it's not favourable to one side of the discussion. > -- NS
