Hi,
> You didn't get warnings when mixing undefined with Number or String?
No warnings are given.
The same code compiled using the FlexSDK also doesn’t give any warnings.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
I’m curious and certainly not a veto / asking you to revert this.
Is there any reason why this isn’t a BailoutDisableBead via PAYG concepts?
Thanks,
Justin
> On 25 Jun 2017, at 7:36 pm, ha...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Repository: flex-asjs
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/tlf 26b15e5a0 -> 9986
Sure.
The bug was that specifying the initial disabled value in MXML caused a runtime
error:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-asjs/repo
>> Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-asjs/commit/99864a8c
>> Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-asjs/tree/99864a8c
>>
Harbs,
Your TLF branch will not be soon merged, can you more important fixes from
time to time make also to develop ?
Thanks,
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-flex-asjs-git-commit-Di
I’m actually thinking of merging TLF back sometime over the next few weeks.
I’m at the point where TLF is working pretty well…
If there’s specific commits that someone wants before then, I’ll be happy to
help with cherry picking.
> On Jun 25, 2017, at 3:14 PM, piotrz wrote:
>
> Harbs,
>
> Yo
WOW! Great news :) Looking forward to that. !
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-flex-asjs-git-commit-DisableBead-should-not-access-the-strand-until-it-s-added-tp62602p62606.html
Sent fr
I have seen it in real world code. In fact, I personally use strict
equality in ActionScript most of the time.
- Josh
On Jun 24, 2017 12:35 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
I have never seen real world ActionScript code which uses strict equality
for null.
The argument to use strict equality “because of mo
I have yet to hear a good reason not to default to null either. Why are you
fighting this so hard? All of your arguments that I can recall seem to be
that Justin's performance claims aren't as big as he says. Is there more
that I missed? Because if it's little more than that, then, at the very
leas
I should make clear that even though I said "at the very least", which
might sounds like it's minor, I actually think this parity is more
important than any performance improvements.
- Josh
On Jun 25, 2017 9:36 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
> I have yet to hear a good reason not to default to null
> I actually think this parity is more important than any performance
> improvements.
I agree with that. Although, I have two minds on this. I wrote my
counter-argument to my own arguments after this email (which was making the
same point you are making). However, after thinking about this some
For kicks I just checked my minified code of my app for equality and inequality
checks and there were 5466 instances. Just adding strict equality would add 3KB
to my file size. (out of 1.8 MB, but still...)
It would be an interesting exercise to see much much adding null initialization
would ad
I'd also be curious to see size comparisons using gzip too, which is pretty
standard in the JS world.
- Josh
On Jun 25, 2017 10:57 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
For kicks I just checked my minified code of my app for equality and
inequality checks and there were 5466 instances. Just adding strict
equality
Yup.
If we add the option to the compiler, we can do some tests with and without
initialization. Strict equality would be a little harder but that should be
doable as well. (A temporary find and replace should work even though it might
break code. It’ll at least give an idea on the impact to co
Hi Alex,
What's the plan with release ? I think we have enough votes do we wait still
on others ?
Thanks,
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Discuss-Release-Apache-FlexJS-0-8-0-RC2
Interesting factoid:
My original Flash Flex app was 1.5 MB plus a 395 KB module.
The ported Javascript version is 1.8 MB before gzipping plus maybe 100KB of
images. The main app after gzipping is 494KB. That’s including all the
framework code and TLF.
So even after figuring in linked images, t
Hi,
> It would be an interesting exercise to see much much adding null
> initialization would add to file size. I would guess that it would be
> significant.
It’s not from the test’s I’ve done. I’ve also mentioned this several times you
keep forgetting that the closure compiles optimises the c
No I don’t.
> On Jun 26, 2017, at 1:04 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> you keep forgetting that the closure compiles optimises the code
I’m not sure how you will do that unless you use every part of the SDK.
My point was that I would like to try it on my own app which does have quite
extensive SDK use (as well as many, many other classes). I will do that if and
when we have these compiler options in Falcon.
> On Jun 26, 2017, a
Vote passed with 4 +1 votes.
On 6/20/17, 10:55 PM, "piotrz" wrote:
>Voting again, cause I did mistake and examined last nightly builds not
>RC2:
>
>+1 (Binding)
>Package
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apac
>he.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fflex%2Ffalcon%2F0.8
Vote passed with 5 +1 votes.
On 6/21/17, 6:36 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>+1 (binding)
>
>I checked:
>- signatures and hashes correct
>- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
>- all source files have ASF headers
>- no unexpected binary files in release
>- Can compile from source
>
>I compiled a lar
Gah, I give up. The Adobe AIR SDK download kept failing several times :-(
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Alex Harui
wrote:
> Vote passed with 4 +1 votes.
>
> On 6/20/17, 10:55 PM, "piotrz" wrote:
>
> >Voting again, cause I did mistake and examined last nightly builds not
> >RC2:
Add "result" to subject line so it is easier to find in the archives.
-Alex
On 6/25/17, 10:57 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Vote passed with 4 +1 votes.
>
>On 6/20/17, 10:55 PM, "piotrz" wrote:
>
>>Voting again, cause I did mistake and examined last nightly builds not
>>RC2:
>>
>>+1 (Binding)
>>Pac
22 matches
Mail list logo
