Vote passed with 4 +1 votes. On 6/20/17, 10:55 PM, "piotrz" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Voting again, cause I did mistake and examined last nightly builds not >RC2: > >+1 (Binding) >Package >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apac >he.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fflex%2Ffalcon%2F0.8.0%2Frc2%2Fapache-flex-fa >lconjx-0.8.0-src.zip&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc26c632ed907440402f708d4b86c726b%7C >fa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636336223296733543&sdata=2Lvcbh >nO6d55b8awQqAlcEC0wQ8htJZPXvq3X6hZCyE%3D&reserved=0 >Java 1.8 >OS: Windows 10 amd64 10.0 >Source kit signatures match: y >Source kit builds: y >README is ok: y >README_JX is ok: y >RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y >RELEASE_NOTES_JX is ok: y >NOTICE is ok: y >LICENSE is ok: y >No unapproved licenses or archives in source package: y >No unapproved binaries in source package: y > >Package >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apac >he.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fflex%2Ffalcon%2F0.8.0%2Frc2%2Fbinaries%2Fapa >che-flex-falconjx-0.8.0-bin.zip&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc26c632ed907440402f708d4 >b86c726b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636336223296733543&s >data=O3GnnmMC6TvMEcuobOgIhlKQBhiaI8hPXCCXvDyM6cA%3D&reserved=0 >Binary kit signatures match: y >NOTICE is ok: y >LICENSE is ok: y >No unapproved licenses or files in jars: y >No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y >No unapproved binaries in binary package: y > >Thanks, Piotr > > > >----- >Apache Flex PMC >piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >-- >View this message in context: >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fle >x-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com%2FVOTE-Release-Apache-Flex-FalconJX-0- >8-0-RC2-tp62495p62510.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc26c632ed907440402f708d4b86c7 >26b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636336223296733543&sdata= >dCmSHWHkV8pvAdFVWaN1OEgN9vXthSSpxdt%2FGY5R01I%3D&reserved=0 >Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
