Hi,
> Can you point me to the instructions on how to package LICENSE in an EXE
> and/or DMG file?
Not sure why you are asking. But you can add assets to an AIR app that get
packaged into the apps and one of those assets could be a LICENSE and NOTICE
file. The issue here is that it’s not very di
On Jun 12, 2015 12:09 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Can you point me to the instructions on how to package LICENSE in an EXE
> > and/or DMG file?
>
> Not sure why you are asking. But you can add assets to an AIR app that
get packaged into the apps and one of those assets could be a LICE
Would love to have this :-)
I remember having some really big trouble in the Flexmojos Testsuite with some
quirks in ASDoc starting with Adobe Flex 4.6 ... Velocity is also really cool.
I use it in a lot of projects and it should produce more solid output than the
XSLT approach. And finally it'
Hi Rajveer,
may I ask what your intention is writing these enquiry emails to this list and
privately regarding FlexUnit?
It sort of feels like you have been assigned the task of evaluating something
and you are relaying the questions to this list. I for my part don't really
feel motivated to a
On 6/12/15, 12:18 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>>
>> Normally you would ship the binary and LICENSE and NOTICE file along
>>with
>the executable all in a archive.
>
>I vote for avoiding a binary release altogether. It is not required for
>a
>valid Apache release.
The problem is that the D
>
> we’ll get an answer by then otherwise I think I’ll just rename the
> “Disclaimer” link button to “Legal Stuff” and add the L & N to the web
> page it points to.
>
That absolutely makes the most sense of anything I've read on the thread.
+ 1
Just do it ;-)
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> The problem is that the DMG and EXE files for the Installer *are* the
> binary release. EXE and DMG files are not archives so you can’t just pack
> L & N into them. Packing up L & N into the .air file that becomes EXE or
> DMG doesn’t make
On 6/12/15, 7:02 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>>Doing the RC is still behind trying to get Mike’s JS.swc in the FlexJS
>> Nightly and refactoring the Installer source for the Git-Split.
>
>
>
>Alex, what does this mean?
>
>Mike
>
That folks can install FlexJS Nightly, run js/bin/jsc MyASFile.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 6/12/15, 7:02 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>
> >>Doing the RC is still behind trying to get Mike’s JS.swc in the FlexJS
> >> Nightly and refactoring the Installer source for the Git-Split.
> >
> >
> >
> >Alex, what does this mean?
> >
Hi Guys,
I just finished releasing JBurg 1.10.1 to Maven :-) (Currently it's in the
Sonatype OSS repo and will be synced to Maven Central within a day or so)
Tom made me a comitter yesterday giving me the mojo for publishing the relases.
I'll try to support him in publishing future versions (
On 6/12/15, 7:39 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>
>Ah yeah ok I get that but it was more about the "refactoring the Installer
>source for the Git-Split", I wasn't explicit about that.
The Installer is in the flex-utilities repo along with many other
“products” like Squiggly and Tour De Flex and
Cool!
On 6/12/15, 8:26 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi Guys,
>
>
>I just finished releasing JBurg 1.10.1 to Maven :-) (Currently it's in
>the Sonatype OSS repo and will be synced to Maven Central within a day or
>so)
>
>
>Tom made me a comitter yesterday giving me the mojo for publishing the
>r
OK, can folks start replacing “Disclaimer” in the localized .properties
files? Or tell me what it is in this thread and I’ll change it later.
I’m still working out of the develop branch.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 6/12/15, 6:28 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>>
>> we’ll get an answer by then otherwise I thi
Alex, so did the initial jsc require an MXML file for the main? So the way
it is now, we can pass an mxml or as main file and it will basically treat
them the same but, JS.swc is added to the library path for DOM features,
correct?
Mike
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
Also, speaking of Maven stuff: Have you decided on the name for the new
repo? Do yo have time to move all the maven-related folders under that
folder? I can try to do it if you don’t have time.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 6/12/15, 8:30 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Cool!
>
>On 6/12/15, 8:26 AM, "Christofer
I didn’t try MXML, just AS.
On 6/12/15, 8:42 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>Alex, so did the initial jsc require an MXML file for the main? So the way
>it is now, we can pass an mxml or as main file and it will basically treat
>them the same but, JS.swc is added to the library path for DOM featu
Ok, I am confused again. I thought with FlexJS you were required to have a
Main.mxml file, not .as, am I wrong?
BTW, So the JS.swc is working in FB ok?
Mike
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I didn’t try MXML, just AS.
>
> On 6/12/15, 8:42 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>
>
You know, I am being an idiot, I can work on compilers but it the simple
things that confuse me. What is the correct way to test nightlies of
FlexJS? I tried building the installer.xml in flex-asjs and it totally
screwed up the folder.
So what should I have setup to test the compiler with FlexJS p
Hi Alex,
well the flex-maven-plugin and the flex-sdk-converter both are maven related,
but don't have much in common. I was thinking of calling the repo
flex-maven-tools and having the flex-maven-plugin and flex-sdk-converter inside
that (currently the plugin is in a directory maven-flex-plugi
On 6/12/15, 9:05 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
> well the flex-maven-plugin and the flex-sdk-converter both are maven
>related, but don't have much in common. I was thinking of calling the
>repo flex-maven-tools and having the flex-maven-plugin and
>flex-sdk-converter inside that (cu
On 6/12/15, 8:55 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>Ok, I am confused again. I thought with FlexJS you were required to have a
>Main.mxml file, not .as, am I wrong?
FlexJS can support AS-only projects as well. See
examples/DataBindingTest_as (of course I haven’t tried that recently).
>
>BTW, So t
Hi Alex,
Well, I've been trying to get why I always get a cost "not feasible" for your
function but I'm failing to understand the logic of jBurg, maybe seing your
solution will unligthen me but at the moment I'm totally in the dark.
Frédéric THOMAS
> F
On 6/12/15, 9:00 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>You know, I am being an idiot, I can work on compilers but it the simple
>things that confuse me. What is the correct way to test nightlies of
>FlexJS? I tried building the installer.xml in flex-asjs and it totally
>screwed up the folder.
>
>So wh
I fiddled with the build script. It seems to copy index.template.html from
the FLEX_HOME/templates/swfobject directory.
Any reason why we just don't check that file into
FLEXJS_HOME/templates/swfobject as well?
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> That is probably a
Can someone please take a look a this?
Thanks,
EdB
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:09 PM, adpg wrote:
> GitHub user adpg opened a pull request:
>
> https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/pull/19
>
> Update DateTimeFormatterEx.as
>
> Proposing patch for bug Apache Flex / FLEX-34581: DateSpi
Yes, double bump.
Can someone please take a look at this?
EdB
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Dretch wrote:
> Github user Dretch commented on the pull request:
>
> https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/pull/18#issuecomment-110656554
>
> Bump. Could this pull request be considered?
>
>
I'll take this one.
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Can someone please take a look a this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:09 PM, adpg wrote:
>
> > GitHub user adpg opened a pull request:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/p
I'm playing stupid here but, how does a committer/PMC go about fulfilling a
pull request?
Can you explain or point me to documentation?
Mike
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:53 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> I'll take this one.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Erik de Bruin
>
I think this is documented somewhere, but I will give it a go here.
The github pull request usually has an url like:
https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/pull/19
You will just have to append a ".patch" to the end of the url like this:
https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/pull/19.patch
That would giv
Is there any protocol on testing stuff, or does experience warrant
understanding the side effects and making a decision based on your
understanding?
Mike
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 3:08 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> I think this is documented somewhere, but I will give it a go here.
>
> The git
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Michael Schmalle <
teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there any protocol on testing stuff, or does experience warrant
> understanding the side effects and making a decision based on your
> understanding?
>
At a minimum, a build, checkin test before commiting
OK, I will work on it. Thanks for trying, it is rather strange stuff.
On 6/12/15, 9:16 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>Well, I've been trying to get why I always get a cost "not feasible" for
>your function but I'm failing to understand the logic of jBurg, maybe
>seing your solution w
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/pull/19
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
On 6/12/15, 11:39 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>I fiddled with the build script. It seems to copy index.template.html
>from
>the FLEX_HOME/templates/swfobject directory.
>
>Any reason why we just don't check that file into
>FLEXJS_HOME/templates/swfobject as well?
Not really, I generally
Excerpt from Roy on legal-discuss:
There isn't any one way to do it,
but most groups follow the habits of their community
(e.g., java folks add them to the manifest so they
get loaded on top of a jar, EXE folks use a static array
or build tool to place them at the top of bottom of t
OK, I think I got it. Try my latest commit.
-Alex
On 6/12/15, 12:41 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>OK, I will work on it. Thanks for trying, it is rather strange stuff.
>
>On 6/12/15, 9:16 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>
>>Hi Alex,
>>
>>Well, I've been trying to get why I always get a cost "not fea
Well I have just tested the boundaries of what will compile to a swc. Wow,
I SERIOUSLY did not think I was going to figure this out but a good puzzle
is always good for the brain.
(sorry for the code but I am trying to explain something)
/**
* namespace
* @const
*/
var chrome = {};
/** @const
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 6/12/15, 11:39 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
> >I fiddled with the build script. It seems to copy index.template.html
> >from
> >the FLEX_HOME/templates/swfobject directory.
> >
> >Any reason why we just don't check that file into
Hmm, In retrospect, I don't know if I am doing this right. This is what I
get for not having JS experience. :)
I know I am creating the packages right but I guess access wise, I don't
need it... The cross compiler should just resolve these things like you do
with qualifiedNames.
I guess I need to
Hi,
We already distribute the binaries here [1], wouldn’t the simple answer be to
package those up in an archive and include the required NOTICE and LICENSE
files just as we do with the source? Generally the LICENSE and NOTICE files are
also placed in the dist directory outside of the binary /
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We already distribute the binaries here [1], wouldn’t the simple answer be
> to package those up in an archive and include the required NOTICE and
> LICENSE files just as we do with the source? Generally the LICENSE and
> NOTICE file
On 6/12/15, 4:31 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We already distribute the binaries here [1], wouldn’t the simple answer
>be to package those up in an archive and include the required NOTICE and
>LICENSE files just as we do with the source?
Do you mean, instead of an EXE and DMG, it would b
Okay, I just pushed a change the build script that includes the LICENSE and
NOTICE files along with the installation exe/dmg. These files would end up
in the installation directory. I think this is sufficient, right?
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 6/12/
Hi,
> Okay, I just pushed a change the build script that includes the LICENSE and
> NOTICE files along with the installation exe/dmg. These files would end up
> in the installation directory. I think this is sufficient, right?
Partly. The LICENSE and NOTICE files need to reflect the contents of
Hi,
The part on binary redistributions applies and is worth a read [1].
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary
I grabbed the EXE off the CI server. The Hex Editor I have can’t find the
LICENSE by examining the EXE file. My understanding from Roy was that’s
how most folks are going to look, so I’m not sure if this approach is
going to work. It might be that the LICENSE is compressed and thus not
discovera
On Jun 12, 2015 9:41 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
> I grabbed the EXE off the CI server. The Hex Editor I have can’t find the
> LICENSE by examining the EXE file. My understanding from Roy was that’s
> how most folks are going to look, so I’m not sure if this approach is
> going to work. It might
On 6/12/15, 10:38 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Jun 12, 2015 9:41 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>>
>> I grabbed the EXE off the CI server. The Hex Editor I have can’t find
>>the
>> LICENSE by examining the EXE file. My understanding from Roy was that’s
>> how most folks are going to look, s
>
> Sounds like a convoluted way to do this.
>
> I think we are overthinking this.
Ya think?
This is what happens when you let loose the lawyers ;-)
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
49 matches
Mail list logo
