Ok, I am confused again. I thought with FlexJS you were required to have a Main.mxml file, not .as, am I wrong?
BTW, So the JS.swc is working in FB ok? Mike On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > I didn’t try MXML, just AS. > > On 6/12/15, 8:42 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Alex, so did the initial jsc require an MXML file for the main? So the way > >it is now, we can pass an mxml or as main file and it will basically treat > >them the same but, JS.swc is added to the library path for DOM features, > >correct? > > > >Mike > > > >On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On 6/12/15, 7:39 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> > >>wrote: > >> > >> > > >> >Ah yeah ok I get that but it was more about the "refactoring the > >>Installer > >> >source for the Git-Split", I wasn't explicit about that. > >> > >> The Installer is in the flex-utilities repo along with many other > >> “products” like Squiggly and Tour De Flex and Mavenizer and really, they > >> should each have their own repo. But we have to put all code destined > >>for > >> a new repo under a single top-level folder. > >> > >> > > >> >So do you have it automatically adding JS.swc to any build in FlexJS? > >>Or > >> >is > >> >the 'jsc' to including the JS.swc, I am not good at understanding this > >> >stuff yet. > >> > >> JS.swc is in the FalconJX Nightly, and I hope the next time the Falcon > >> build passes the additional scripts will be in the right place and run > >> correctly when Falcon gets installed as part of the FlexJS install. > >> > >> -Alex > >> > >> > >
