I was talking to some of the people at a.o. infra on IRC and they mentioned
that they have a new Windows VM that they launched for CI services... They
are looking for people to help them test it out and get it setup. Do we
have any interest in that? They would like to get this setup to help with
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
> I was talking to some of the people at a.o. infra on IRC and they mentioned
> that they have a new Windows VM that they launched for CI services... They
> are looking for people to help them test it out and get it setup. Do we
> hav
I guess my question is: what are the tradeoffs of getting a flex-only CI
server on my Azure VM vs relying on Apache?
At Apache, we keep seeing other projects have build issues and require
configuration changes that block us. And as Om just pointed out, once
Infra has some other fire to fight, we
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I guess my question is: what are the tradeoffs of getting a flex-only CI
> server on my Azure VM vs relying on Apache?
>
>
One disadvantage is that with Azure VM, we tend to run out of free credits
around the 20th of each month. Erik usually
How much would it cost me to use my Azure VM instead of the Apache build
server?
On 4/17/14 11:39 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> I guess my question is: what are the tradeoffs of getting a flex-only CI
>> server on my Azure VM vs relyi
Nothing.
If you run a "medium" instance, it will be more than plenty powerful to do
all build tasks whenever needed. And with the "free credits" that come with
the committer MSDN licences you can run a "medium" instance for about 1.5
months every month ;-)
EdB
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 8:45 PM,
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> How much would it cost me to use my Azure VM instead of the Apache build
> server?
>
Depends on how much you use the machine. Mustella will probably cost a lot
to run. Occasional sdk builds per checkin will be much less.
If you use your co
Erik,
If you didn't switch over to medium during the month, what do you think
you'd end up paying each month?
-Alex
On 4/17/14 11:49 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>Nothing.
>
>If you run a "medium" instance, it will be more than plenty powerful to do
>all build tasks whenever needed. And with the
Max 10 - 20 Euros.
EdB
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Erik,
>
> If you didn't switch over to medium during the month, what do you think
> you'd end up paying each month?
>
> -Alex
>
> On 4/17/14 11:49 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>
> >Nothing.
> >
> >If you run a "medium
At "large", an instance runs at about $5 a day. You get something like $150
a month, so can't run over the free part all that much.
EdB
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Max 10 - 20 Euros.
>
> EdB
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> Erik,
OK, so what do others think? I'm totally fine with taking my Azure VM and
turning it into the 'official' Flex CI server. We can try a 'medium'
instance and see if it falls behind as we add more checkintests on the
FlexJS side, and if we need to upgrade to 'large' I'll pay for it myself.
It just
They did say that they have some relationship with Microsoft for Azure
boxes as well. Nobody has taken them up on it, but it might be something
to ask -- that way you don't have to do it on your own dime when we go
over..
-Nick
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> OK, so what
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> OK, so what do others think? I'm totally fine with taking my Azure VM and
> turning it into the 'official' Flex CI server. We can try a 'medium'
> instance and see if it falls behind as we add more checkintests on the
> FlexJS side, and if w
Can you or Om pursue that angle? To me the key things we want are a
Flex-only box so we don't have to worry about pollution from other
projects, and total administration control. Infra can have admin rights
and can forbid us from doing certain network/security things, but
otherwise, we need to be
On 4/17/14 12:14 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> OK, so what do others think? I'm totally fine with taking my Azure VM
>>and
>> turning it into the 'official' Flex CI server. We can try a 'medium'
>> instance and see if it falls behi
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Can you or Om pursue that angle?
I am planning on catching up with Gavin on IRC. I will ask him about
this.
Thanks,
Om
> To me the key things we want are a
> Flex-only box so we don't have to worry about pollution from other
> projects,
+1 I'm all fed up with 'builds@a.o' (you could probably tell from my emails
;-)) and it's time we get reliable CI going.
EdB
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> OK, so what do others think? I'm totally fine with taking my Azure VM and
> turning it into the 'official' Flex C
Hi Piotr,
I decided to take a quick look. It appears that maxChars is enforced in
RichEditableText and not in TLF. I'm going to dig further unless you want
to do the digging.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 4/15/14 1:41 AM, "piotrz" wrote:
>Thanks Alex. I will try to do this but no promise.
>
>Piotr
>
>
>
OK, thanks. It sounds like the three of us have consensus that we'd like
to do builds on our own box. If Apache can provide us with our own box
that's great, but otherwise we'll do it on our own.
If Gavin feels slighted by our pulling out of Builds, feel free to tell
him that, IMO, it isn't that
And it is official, the Apache Secretary has filed the donation paperwork.
Apache Flex now "owns" all of the content below. (Apache doesn't really
own it, but rather, has a license to it).
I recently found out that post-graduation donations from Adobe were not
handled properly by the Flex PMC.
Alex,
Let me know if I can help with the scrubbing effort. My work-load will
lighten up at the office in a few weeks and I can put a few cycles towards
that.
-Nick
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> And it is official, the Apache Secretary has filed the donation paperwork.
I just want to add something. Being that this is a open source project. We
could get a free license for Bamboo that allows unlimited remote agents.
Bamboo is much much much easier to add remote agents(windows, linux, osx)
than Jenkins, Hudson, etc. As the agents don't need to have any server
softw
Hi Nick,
Thanks for volunteering. Yeah, I think I can use your help. I should
have a better understanding of the steps we need to take to get Incubator
sign off by time you get freed up a bit. So ping me when you are sure
you're going to have cycles and we'll figure it out.
Thanks,
-Alex
On
Looks like we have to have a [VOTE] to accept the donation. Stay tuned.
-Alex
On 4/17/14 1:19 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Hi Nick,
>
>Thanks for volunteering. Yeah, I think I can use your help. I should
>have a better understanding of the steps we need to take to get Incubator
>sign off by time
Please vote to accept the donation of the following Flex-related code and
documentation from Adobe Systems, Inc.
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks,
-Alex
In the donation is:
1. Several Flex articles from the ADC web-site.
2. An updated version of the FDB debugger that contain
On Apr 17, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Please vote to accept the donation of the following Flex-related code and
> documentation from Adobe Systems, Inc.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> In the donation is:
>
>
> 1. Several Flex articles fro
+1 (binding)
-Mark
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Please vote to accept the donation of the following Flex-related code and
> documentation from Adobe Systems, Inc.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> In the donation is:
>
>
> 1. Sever
+1 Binding
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Jun Heider wrote:
>
> On Apr 17, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> > Please vote to accept the donation of the following Flex-related code and
> > documentation from Adobe Systems, Inc.
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
>
2 is a must have!!!
On Apr 17, 2014 6:32 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
> Please vote to accept the donation of the following Flex-related code and
> documentation from Adobe Systems, Inc.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> In the donation is:
>
>
> 1. Several Flex
Place any discussions in this thread.
-Mark
+1 [binding]
On 4/17/2014 6:32 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
Please vote to accept the donation of the following Flex-related code and
documentation from Adobe Systems, Inc.
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks,
-Alex
In the donation is:
1. Several Flex articles from the ADC web-sit
Hi,
> I decided to take a quick look. It appears that maxChars is enforced in
> RichEditableText and not in TLF.
It is enforced in this case it just allows a maximum of 8 not 7 as it should.
Justin
HI,
> Do we want to at least use the ASF build server for providing official
> nightly dev builds?
+1 We can resonably trust infra machines to be secure and that non one has
fiddled with the nightly builds. Our own set up machines are likely to be less
secure and there's a small risk that somet
On 4/17/14 3:52 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> I decided to take a quick look. It appears that maxChars is enforced in
>> RichEditableText and not in TLF.
>It is enforced in this case it just allows a maximum of 8 not 7 as it
>should.
It looks to me that it knows that maxChars is 7, but
+1 (binding)
Non-PMC members are welcome to vote as well. Don't worry about the
"binding" in the votes, it is only to make it easier to tally votes. We
would like to know how the entire community feels about this, not just the
PMC.
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Mark Kessler
wrote:
> Place an
Hi,I'm happy for the flex related donations from Adobe, I think they
should've done it a long time ago.BTW, there is no updates from Flash
Builder since v4.7, if Adobe doesn't like it, they should totally donate it to
Apache!DarkStone2014-04-18
At 2014-04-18 07:06:18, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrot
Do we need to add a line in the README about adding the tests path to the
trust file? Without it, you cannot finish an "ant main".
-Mark
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> This is the discussion thread.
>
> In this RC3 I fixed some issues that Justin found:
> -take some para
Hi,
Just trying to run the compc/mxmlc in compiler.jx and get this:
./mxmlc
Using Falcon codebase: ./../../compiler
Using Flex SDK: /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.12released/
Error: Unable to access jarfile ./../lib/mxmlc.jar
Is this expected?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
The README_JX makes reference to the "Apache FlexJS SDK" as one of the
prerequisites but doesn't tell you where you can get it.
Also why do you need this if you just want to take some plain old AS with no
Flex classes and convert to JS? I has assumed that the that FlexJS depended on
Falco
Did you run ant all at the top level?
Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.
Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
Just trying to run the compc/mxmlc in compiler.jx and get this:
./mxmlc
Using Falcon codebase: ./../../compiler
Using Flex SDK: /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.12
HI,
Work in progress:
NOTICE, LICENCE, RELEASE_NOTE all OK (minor formatting/line length issues)
checksum/sigs good
rat report good
can compile from source
unit test pass
can use mxmlc and compc without error
One very minor issue (certainly not a blocker)
Build number not correct (build number wa
Hi,
Looks like there is only the old mxmlc.jar produced?
find . -name "mxmlc.jar" -print
./compiler/generated/dist/sdk/lib-legacy/mxmlc.jar
Justin
Hi,
But if I do this:
cd compiler.jx
ant
cd ..
find . -name "mxmlc.jar" -print
./compiler/generated/dist/sdk/lib-legacy/mxmlc.jar
./compiler.jx/lib/mxmlc.jar
It finds both.
So looks like the top level ant isn't running ant on compiler.jx
Thanks,
Justin
If binding refers to Flex data binding, I would say it is not the 1st
priority, because it is based on Actionscript, developers can even make the
same thing by ourselves.
But the worker debugger thing is totally inside Flash Player, which is not
open, we have to rely Adobe, so it should be the 1st
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
Just to be clear, especially since my last response was from my phone:
To build the falconjx source package you should run
ant all
"all" is a target in the top-level build.xml
The default target "main" only builds falcon and not falconjx. There
might be a better way to handle this, but
OK will add. Not sure if it will go in this release or the next. Depends
on how badly we need another RC. Again, this is an alpha build and I
think most folks are going to use the binary packages.
On 4/17/14 5:13 PM, "Mark Kessler" wrote:
>Do we need to add a line in the README about adding t
HI,
> To build the falconjx source package you should run
>
> ant all
>
> "all" is a target in the top-level build.xml
README says:
ant all(or just ant since the default target is main)
REMDEME_JX says:
ant main(or just ant since the default target is main)
So that shoul
+1 (non binding)
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Justin Mclean >wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
>
--
Warm Regards,
*Rush-me*
+1 (binding)
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Accept-Adobe-Donation-tp36992p37018.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
+1
--Original Message--
From: piotrz
To: dev@flex.apache.org
ReplyTo: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Adobe Donation
Sent: Apr 18, 2014 11:16 AM
+1 (binding)
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex
On 4/17/14 9:49 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>HI,
>
>> To build the falconjx source package you should run
>>
>> ant all
>>
>> "all" is a target in the top-level build.xml
>
>README says:
>ant all(or just ant since the default target is main)
>
>REMDEME_JX says:
>ant main(o
It took me much more time to run TLF tests related to this class than I
thought, but they are ready.
Alex did you push this changes to repo ? I can run tlf tests on your changes
but on Monday.
I have just started vacation here, so no access to my code. :)
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotr
Sorry I didn't see your post about that is not TLF. It's ok.
Thanks to this bug I've already run 8 (it's around 200 tests) tests classes.
;)
Thanks Alex.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nab
I haven't pushed changes yet.
The changes are at the bottom of my previous post so you can try it
quickly if you have time.
-Alex
On 4/17/14 10:58 PM, "piotrz" wrote:
>It took me much more time to run TLF tests related to this class than I
>thought, but they are ready.
>Alex did you push this
HI,
> OK, I will remove the parenthetical part in README_JX in the next RC. And
> add Mark's mention of the trust files.
There are fairly minor issues but I think, but people need as much help as they
can get to actually get it to work.
> I would like to get an official release out soon so folk
On 4/17/14 11:18 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>HI,
>
>> OK, I will remove the parenthetical part in README_JX in the next RC.
>>And
>> add Mark's mention of the trust files.
>There are fairly minor issues but I think, but people need as much help
>as they can get to actually get it to work.
>
>>
Hi,
> I'm not sure what error you are referring to. Didn't the 'can't find jar
> file' go away after you ran ant all?
Copied from previous email:
May be another -1 sorry, dummy.as is a very simple class with a single trace in
the constructor, dummy.mxml is a very simple s:Appliaction with a a:
Please Justin, the only goal for this package is to be upstream of FlexJS.
To me, it does not matter how it works against the Flex SDK. Let's get
these packages out so we can attract more folks so a few might actually
contribute and help fix these issues.
If you can build the packages and use Fa
60 matches
Mail list logo
