HI,
> Falcon is only a compiler. It copies the Flex SDKs debugger (FDB) in
> order to provide the equivalent functionality.
Seems a big dependancy to have just for the debugger. As Flex is Apache license
could be grab the binary and take the few files(?) we need from that? Not that
I think thi
Hi,
I just discover this:
http://weblog.bocoup.com/dive-into-flexbox/
"Flexbox is a new layout mode in CSS3 that is designed for the more
sophisticated needs of the modern web"
and this:
http://devbryce.com/site/flexbox/
someone was aware of this? btw, curious name "flex", isn't it? ;)
201
Hi,
> This is a frequent puzzle for me with Ant. Sometimes Ant is able to
> create the chain of missing folders and sometimes it won't.
Managed to get further with:
mkdir -p
/Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlexFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.0.1-src/compiler/generated/dist/sdk/bin
mkdir -p
/
Hi,
Anyone have something to add to this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34218
The changes in 4.12 are a regression from previous version, but if we do revert
it causes a) user errors to be silently eaten and b) performance and garbage
collection to be worse.
Are we likely to break
Yes. Flexbox is really good for relative layout. HTML is working hard at
catching up with what we take for granted in Flex… ;-)
Of course the problem is Internet Explorer: http://caniuse.com/#search=flexbox
There's some great info on css-tricks.com on flexbox:
http://css-tricks.com/snippets/css
Hi folks
I set up a Continuous Integration process for a Mobile app created with
Flex/Air. It was not an easy task for me, because I did this for the first
time. Since there may be other people like me struggling to do the same, I
thought it would be worth sharing my experience with you guys (es
On 4/13/14 2:13 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Anyone have something to add to this:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34218
>
>The changes in 4.12 are a regression from previous version, but if we do
>revert it causes a) user errors to be silently eaten and b) performance
>and ga
Hi,
as far as I understoof Alex most of the stuff is needed in order to make
FlashBuillder happy. Even if the compiler libs may have been replaced to 90%,
the rest oft he framework (client side swfs and swcs are still needed).
Perhaps I should speed up my efforts to making the maven deployment
Hi Daniel,
Great tutorial. Running Flex Cover and especially integrating this into the
build is a real PITA.
Flexmojos (Maven Plugin for building Flex applications) does exactly what you
are doing, but instead of using Ant it uses Maven.
(Ok the order is slightly different and I am currently wor
Hi,
The vote passes with 4 +1 binding votes and no +0 or -1s.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
The votes passed and I've placed 4.2.0 into the release area, it will take 24
hours to propagate and then we can announce it to the world.
The web site and blog needs an update - Nick do you need a hand with that?
Also as this is the first Apache release of FlexUnit we might be able to get
On Apr 13, 2014 3:59 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The votes passed and I've placed 4.2.0 into the release area, it will
take 24 hours to propagate and then we can announce it to the world.
>
> The web site and blog needs an update - Nick do you need a hand with that?
>
> Also as this is
Hi,
> Although I am not sure if they will allow us to do a PR as it is not a
> major version n. You could definitely ask.
I think the first Apache release counts as a major version, I'll ask.
Justin
Hi,
-1 (binding) for now.
Tested on OSX.
Signatures all good.
LICENSE, NOTICE all good.
README OK but minor issue - this text should probably be removed "This version
of Apache Flex was certified for use with ...", formatting is a little out as
well.
RELEASE_NOTES OK
There is an issue buildi
HI,
OK made it a bit further but think we have some issues.
In in compiler/commandline both mxmlc and compc give errors if you try and run
them which looks like a windows new line issue.
Even when I fix that I get this:
Using Flex SDK: /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.12released/
Error
Hello
Could you please fix issue FLEX-33423?
I reported this issue one year ago.
It still reproduces at Flex SDK 4.11.
I attached reproducible source.
And it is easy to reproduce.
Step 1. press [INSERT] key
Step 2. input [1234567]
The maxChars is 7, but you can input 8 characters.
thanks
Sh
I'll get the website readied for it tomorrow, and I'll watch the dist to
see when a majority of the sites have the bits. Anybody want to send me a
quote or something I can include in the Blog post?
-Nick
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Although I am not sure i
Hi,
I took a look but it's windows only issue so can't easily reproduce. Can
someone on windows take a look thanks.
I can't see anywhere that the code checks for EditManager.overwriteMode so Im
guessing the code to correctly support insert is missing??
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
At a guess (as I can't reproduce) it looks like the issue may be in the
adjustForOversetForward method of NavigationUtils.
This looks a little suspect to me:
if (controller.absoluteStart + controller.textLength <=
range.absoluteEnd && controller.absoluteStart + controller.textLeng
I think compiler/commandline isn't intended to work from that folder. It
gets copied into the "SDK".
It's a good question as to how "self-sufficient" this kit needs to be when
it is really intended as an upstream distribution for FlexJS. IMO, this
kit is successful when its build script runs suc
On 4/13/14 5:40 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Although I am not sure if they will allow us to do a PR as it is not a
>> major version n. You could definitely ask.
>
>I think the first Apache release counts as a major version, I'll ask.
Didn't we do PR for 4.8 and/or 4.9?
-Alex
Hi,
> I think compiler/commandline isn't intended to work from that folder. It
> gets copied into the "SDK".
Even if it does It will still have the newline issue and this should be pointed
out in the README or RELEASE_NOTES. I certainly expected them to work.
> It's a good question as to how "
Everything you pointed out is a valid issue. The question is whether it
is a blocker for a 0.0.1 release. IMO, if the two packages can build
working examples and the binary kits can be installed and work in FB that
is good enough for this initial release.
-Alex
On 4/13/14 9:34 PM, "Justin Mclea
I agree. As long as the release is properly marked as Alpha quality and
with a version number that indicates the same - 0.01 will do ;-) - everyone
will know to not rely on this for major mission critical enterprise
applications.
I'll get on testing as soon as I get these pesky clients off my back
24 matches
Mail list logo
