Everything you pointed out is a valid issue. The question is whether it is a blocker for a 0.0.1 release. IMO, if the two packages can build working examples and the binary kits can be installed and work in FB that is good enough for this initial release.
-Alex On 4/13/14 9:34 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >Hi, > >> I think compiler/commandline isn't intended to work from that folder. >>It >> gets copied into the "SDK". > >Even if it does It will still have the newline issue and this should be >pointed out in the README or RELEASE_NOTES. I certainly expected them to >work. > >> It's a good question as to how "self-sufficient" this kit needs to be >>when >> it is really intended as an upstream distribution for FlexJS. > >I'm reasonably sure people may use Flacon for stuff other than FlexJS eg >as a replacement for the current mxml/compc compilers. > >> IMO, this kit is successful when its build script runs successfully > >Even if it has failures along the way and still reports success? >Currently it a little hard to work out what success is ie are Java errors >OK or failing tests OK? > >Thanks, >Justin
