Re: [DISCUSS ] Apache Flex guidelines RC2 - discussion

On 11/9/13 11:40 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> If it was a vote among the committers, then more than half of the >> committers who vote is definitely required. >That's why the word total was in there, total = total number != number >who vote. Maybe it is just me, but "total committers vo

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #357

On 11/9/13 11:37 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> /mini_run.sh -mobile tests/mobile/components/ButtonBar/ > >Mobile option was set in local.properties - all pass here. Was the only change the binding change? -3 means the width or height changed (don't remember which one, see BitmapData.comp

Re: [DISCUSS ] Apache Flex guidelines RC2 - discussion

Hi, > Maybe it is just me, but "total committers voting" is the number who > voted, not the number eligible to vote. Any suggestions on better wording? As the Lazy was remove we need something there. Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS ] Apache Flex guidelines RC2 - discussion

Erik suggested adding "of the votes cast". You argued against it, but I didn't understand the argument. I think "of the votes cast" would solve the problem. -Alex On 11/10/13 2:05 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Maybe it is just me, but "total committers voting" is the number who >> vote

Re: [DISCUSS ] Apache Flex guidelines RC2 - discussion

Hi, > Erik suggested adding "of the votes cast". Which I don't think works, also not 100% sure where he wanted that phase added. If we say changed it to this: "Having more than half of the votes cast of total votes is not required with Majority votes." Is confusing as the number of votes cast

Re: [DISCUSS ] Apache Flex guidelines RC2 - discussion

Hi, Meant to say there: "rather NOT introduce an unfamiliar or new term." Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS ] Apache Flex guidelines RC2 - discussion

> The responsibilities of an committer include - Upholding and promoting the Apache Way Should there be a description of the "Apache Way' or link to it? Chris -- Chris Velevitch Manager - Adobe Platform Users Group, Sydney m: 0415 469 095 www.apugs.org.au Adobe Platform Users Group, Sydney Topic

Re: [DISCUSS ] Apache Flex guidelines RC2 - discussion

Hi, > Should there be a description of the "Apache Way' or link to it? Good suggestion + I did consider this. The only official link I could find was this [1], which is a work under progress and doesn't actually give you a lot of information about what the Apache Way is. The current "how it wor

Re: [DISCUSS ] Apache Flex guidelines RC2 - discussion

On 11/10/13 4:29 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >Meant to say there: >"rather NOT introduce an unfamiliar or new term." I figured as much. Interesting that Australian voting is mandatory. Anyway, how about this: "Majority Approval and 2/3 Majority Approval is based on the number of votes c

Re: [DISCUSS ] Apache Flex guidelines RC2 - discussion

Hi, > I figured as much. Interesting that Australian voting is mandatory. We're not the only country to do that: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_voting > Anyway, how about this: > > "Majority Approval and 2/3 Majority Approval is based on the number of > votes cast, not on the number o

Re: [DISCUSS ] Apache Flex guidelines RC2 - discussion

On 11/10/13 9:28 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Any other issues or should I make that change and call another RC vote? I think it would be good enough to install and see what happens. You might want to wait for Erik's input. -Alex

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #357

I just pulled everything from develop branch and can't even get checkintests to pass. Checkintests throws up an error dialog. Has that frozen the CI servers? I dug into it a bit. I think the destFuncFailed flag is the problem. I don't see it getting reset. A binding can get executed several t

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #357

Hi, > I just pulled everything from develop branch and can't even get > checkintests to pass. Both the checkin tests and the binding tests pass here with that change - I've just rerun. Will do a clean and rerun to confirm. Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS ] Apache Flex guidelines RC2 - discussion

Hi, Change made. > I think it would be good enough to install and see what happens. If we change the file we need a new vote just like any other release candidate. > You might want to wait for Erik's input. I'll wait for that. Thanks, Justin

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #357

Hi, >> I just pulled everything from develop branch and can't even get >> checkintests to pass. Confirmed after a clean I'll revert that check in and reopen the JIRA. Thanks, Justin

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #357

I haven't tried Mac, it was on Windows it failed. I'll try Mac now. -Alex On 11/10/13 10:43 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >>> I just pulled everything from develop branch and can't even get >>> checkintests to pass. >Confirmed after a clean I'll revert that check in and reopen the JIRA. >

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella #526

This was me restarting the VM for a clean run after the revert. EdB On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 8:37 AM, wrote: > See > > Changes: > > [jmclean] FLEX-33874 improve binding performance > > [jmclean] update release notes with recent changes