On 11/9/13 11:40 PM, "Justin Mclean" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hi, > >> If it was a vote among the committers, then more than half of the >> committers who vote is definitely required. >That's why the word total was in there, total = total number != number >who vote. Maybe it is just me, but "total committers voting" is the number who voted, not the number eligible to vote. > >> IMO, the definition says that 3 +1's is the minimum, so not sure we >>really >> need this. >We could do with out it but what to avoid confusion re what a majority >is, as I said it has been misunderstood. Sure it would be nice to make it more clear, but to me, these words aren't helping. -Alex
