FlashBuilder 4.6 Fail to connect to WSDL

2013-07-06 Thread Sumudu Chinthaka
Hi All I have posted this problem before also, but didn't really have any reliable solution about it. so i thought of posting the question again with bit more information and screen shots here is what i'm experiencing when i try to connect to my web service using flash builder data service wizar

Re: [2/2] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - support mxml.children-as-data mainstream SDK

2013-07-06 Thread Erik de Bruin
Daring move... what are you trying to achieve? Are you attempting to get some kind of "vanilla SDK" support going for FlexJS? EdB On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:29 AM, wrote: > support mxml.children-as-data mainstream SDK > > > Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk/repo > Commit:

Re: [2/2] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - support mxml.children-as-data mainstream SDK

2013-07-06 Thread Alex Harui
No, this was the original plan for Falcon even at Adobe. The idea is to convert MXML to data structures so that the compiler is not dependent on particular versions of the SDK and thus folks can tweak the behavior of Flex without needing to know how to modify the compiler sources. Regarding Vanil

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #30

2013-07-06 Thread Erik de Bruin
Way to go Alex! One suite down, two to go… EdB On Saturday, July 6, 2013, wrote: > See > > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Re: [2/2] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - support mxml.children-as-data mainstream SDK

2013-07-06 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Is there any overhead for existing applications? Are there there any tests? How about some examples of how to use it. IMO It seems a rather large change to be committed to the SDK without any discussion or explanation. Justin

Re: [2/2] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - support mxml.children-as-data mainstream SDK

2013-07-06 Thread Alex Harui
On 7/6/13 3:14 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >Is there any overhead for existing applications? Just a test to see if the Falcon property is null or not. >Are there there any tests? The mustella tests pass using MXMLC which means that it "did no harm". All kinds of things fail when you try