On 7/6/13 3:14 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi, > >Is there any overhead for existing applications? Just a test to see if the Falcon property is null or not. >Are there there any tests? The mustella tests pass using MXMLC which means that it "did no harm". All kinds of things fail when you try to use Falcon, but I wanted to get it in so as we start fixing Falcon we can test out the new codegen as well as the old. >How about some examples of how to use it. It's all internal codegen and turned on when you set -compiler.mxml.children-as-data when using Falcon. >IMO It seems a rather large change to be committed to the SDK without any >discussion or explanation. Yeah, I should have sent out a heads up. But 4.10 won't be using any of its code paths so I think it isn't that large a change until we start using Falcon. What actually happened was that Git fooled me again. I had a few minutes to fix the mobile tests, updated jenkins.sh and this stuff got pushed unintentionally, although I had planned to push it soon. I'll try to be more careful next time. -Alex
