Yes true. Although I would rather copy the MXFTEText.css file into my
project. There are several MX components referenced in that css file.
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 1:09 AM, Harbs wrote:
> You could also just edit your own css file with the textFieldClass
> reference.
>
> On Dec 15
You could also just edit your own css file with the textFieldClass reference.
On Dec 15, 2015, at 1:26 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
> One thing that nags me is that I have to add a full path to the css file in
> my FB project like this:
> -theme+="C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Flash Builder 4.7
ious degradation, but I know folks much better eyes
> >>> >than I do. I think you are seeing the difference in rendering between
> >>> >device and embedded fonts and maybe also TextLine vs TextField.
> >>> >
> >>> >There have been complaint
>>> >
>>> >There have been complaints in the past about embedded fonts looking
>>>more
>>> >fuzzy or blurry compared to device fonts. I think it has to do with
>>>the
>>> >glyph renderer getting too confident that it can render stem
too confident that it can render stems on
>> >half-pixels instead of messing with kerning to try to put stems on
>> pixels.
>> >
>> >-Alex
>> >
>> >From: Mark Kessler
>> >mailto:kesslerconsult...@gmail.com>>
>> >Reply-To: "dev@
Mark Kessler
> >mailto:kesslerconsult...@gmail.com>>
> >Reply-To: "dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>"
> >mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>>
> >Date: Friday, December 11, 2015 at 11:21 AM
> >To: "dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@fl
("mx.core.UIFTETextField");
}
[1]
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/WSda78ed3a750d6b8f-26a13bbf123c441239d-8000.html
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 1:16 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: mustella for charts
rom: Mark Kessler
>mailto:kesslerconsult...@gmail.com>>
>Reply-To: "dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>"
>mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>>
>Date: Friday, December 11, 2015 at 11:21 AM
>To: "dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>"
>m
@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>"
mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>>
Date: Friday, December 11, 2015 at 11:21 AM
To: "dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>"
mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: mustella for charts
Original baseline image:
Original baseline image: http://tinypic.com/r/245y5xe/9
Current Bad image: http://tinypic.com/r/f0nnd0/9
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Mark Kessler
wrote:
> I'll hold off then for now. But I can tell you the current fonts being
> shown in the baseline have a higher clarity than what the ne
I'll hold off then for now. But I can tell you the current fonts being
shown in the baseline have a higher clarity than what the new baselines
would show. I'll see if this example goes through. First is current,
second is the new one.
[image: Inline image 3][image: Inline image 4]
-Mark
On Fri
On 12/11/15, 9:57 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>Do you know if Spark labels ever worked with Charts? I dont think so.
I was wondering that myself. Somehow, the current chart baseline images
are showing text, so one thing I was going to do was dig into it to
Do you know if Spark labels ever worked with Charts? I dont think so.
Thanks,
Om
On Dec 11, 2015 9:52 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
> On 12/11/15, 9:02 AM, "Mark Kessler" wrote:
>
> >Was testing after doing a simple update to the files. Forgot about the
> >existing bitmap failures. Did you wan
On 12/11/15, 9:02 AM, "Mark Kessler" wrote:
>Was testing after doing a simple update to the files. Forgot about the
>existing bitmap failures. Did you want me to regenerate the baselines for
>them when I commit my changes later?
>
It still bugs me that we are taking away Spark Label usage fr
Was testing after doing a simple update to the files. Forgot about the
existing bitmap failures. Did you want me to regenerate the baselines for
them when I commit my changes later?
[java] =
[java] Passes: 14
[java] Fails: 147
[java]
15 matches
Mail list logo
