Re: Working on SDK with source-path option

2013-08-05 Thread Erik de Bruin
Ah, biting my tongue now. I'll get all information first, then be judgemental ;-) EdB On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 5:18 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > > On Aug 5, 2013 7:19 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >> >> So far, I'm not convinced (understatement following) that this way is >> the way we want to

Re: Working on SDK with source-path option

2013-08-05 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Aug 5, 2013 7:19 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > > So far, I'm not convinced (understatement following) that this way is > the way we want to teach to noob contributors... > > We need to document it, for sure, especially because I'm curious to > see it in action, but I now think that although it i

RE: Working on SDK with source-path option

2013-08-05 Thread Kessler CTR Mark J
o:aha...@adobe.com] Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 10:45 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Cc: OmPrakash Muppirala Subject: Re: Working on SDK with source-path option Hmm. Well, like I think I said, I've never tried this using FlashBuilder or the IDEs. I work from the command line. But fundamen

Re: Working on SDK with source-path option

2013-08-05 Thread Alex Harui
Hmm. Well, like I think I said, I've never tried this using FlashBuilder or the IDEs. I work from the command line. But fundamentally, the process should be: Make a monkey-patch, submit the monkey-patch. I just noticed that there is no link to how to monkey-patch Flex. I thought there was a de

Re: Working on SDK with source-path option

2013-08-05 Thread Erik de Bruin
So far, I'm not convinced (understatement following) that this way is the way we want to teach to noob contributors... We need to document it, for sure, especially because I'm curious to see it in action, but I now think that although it is more laborious, the method Justin - and myself on occasio

Re: Working on SDK with source-path option

2013-08-04 Thread Alex Harui
Yeah. And maybe add more source path so fewer swc get used. But sometimes I have to simply replace the class constant with the actual value. Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone. OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Alex Harui mailto:aha...@adob

Re: Working on SDK with source-path option

2013-08-04 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Try copying that file into source path. The file is already in the source path. Do you mean copy to local src directory? > Sometimes I just temporary alter the method signature. > > > > > Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smart

Re: Working on SDK with source-path option

2013-08-04 Thread Alex Harui
Try copying that file into source path. Sometimes I just temporary alter the method signature. Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone. OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > I've hit other occasional compiler issues where it c

Working on SDK with source-path option

2013-08-04 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > I've hit other occasional compiler issues where it can't resolve some > class constants that are used as optional parameters in method signatures. > I think I've generally gotten around them, but I honestly don't remember > how. > Can you