So far, I'm not convinced (understatement following) that this way is
the way we want to teach to noob contributors...

We need to document it, for sure, especially because I'm curious to
see it in action, but I now think that although it is more laborious,
the method Justin - and myself on occasion - use has better
reproducibility and usability.

EdB



On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Yeah. And maybe add more source path so fewer swc get used. But sometimes I 
> have to simply replace the class constant with the actual value.
>
>
>
>
> Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.
>
> OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Alex Harui 
> <aha...@adobe.com<mailto:aha...@adobe.com>> wrote:
> Try copying that file into source path.
>
> The file is already in the source path.  Do you mean copy to local src 
> directory?
>
> Sometimes I just temporary alter the method signature.
>
>
>
>
> Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.
>
> OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com<mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Alex Harui 
> <aha...@adobe.com<mailto:aha...@adobe.com>> wrote:
>
>>
>> I've hit other occasional compiler issues where it can't resolve some
>> class constants that are used as optional parameters in method signatures.
>>  I think I've generally gotten around them, but I honestly don't remember
>> how.
>>
>
> Can you try to remember how you fixed this issue?  I am trying to create a
> simple example as per Erik's request using
> flex-sdk\frameworks\projects\spark\src as a source path and I am running
> into this issue with the EaseInOutBase and some other class.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>



-- 
Ix Multimedia Software

Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht

T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Reply via email to