Re: [FlexJS] Unit Tests Not Running

2017-06-13 Thread yishayw
we use the "open" command [1] https://forums.adobe.com/thread/505090 -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Unit-Tests-Not-Running-tp62371p62380.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [FlexJS] Unit Tests Not Running

2017-06-13 Thread yishayw
https://paste.apache.org/TLwu -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Unit-Tests-Not-Running-tp62371p62379.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [FlexJS] Unit Tests Not Running

2017-06-13 Thread Alex Harui
Post the console log starting from the beginning. Thanks, -Alex On 6/13/17, 12:31 AM, "yishayw" wrote: >I have a batch file with the following contents: > >%FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER% > >It opens up the Flash Player projector content debugger. The unit tests >for >

[FlexJS] Unit Tests Not Running

2017-06-13 Thread yishayw
I have a batch file with the following contents: %FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER% It opens up the Flash Player projector content debugger. The unit tests for Basic, don't open it up however, and the build fails. Any ideas? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-develo

Re: [FlexJS] [Discuss] Add support for "automationName" for making unit-tests simpler

2017-01-16 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi guys, Thanks for that … definitely have to look a little more into the cool stuff on the client side and not always just dig in the compiler and the build tools ;-) Chris Am 16.01.17, 10:30 schrieb "carlos.rov...@gmail.com im Auftrag von Carlos Rovira" : thanks Om, just having some pro

Re: [FlexJS] [Discuss] Add support for "automationName" for making unit-tests simpler

2017-01-16 Thread Carlos Rovira
thanks Om, just having some problems with my laptop today :( well I think the example posted will help Chris to figure about an AutomationBead thanks! 2017-01-16 10:27 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala : > Looks like the mailing list removed the css snippet you posted. > > Thanks, > Om > > On Mon,

Re: [FlexJS] [Discuss] Add support for "automationName" for making unit-tests simpler

2017-01-16 Thread Carlos Rovira
sorry the email just sent :) mdl:List css: List { IBeadView: ClassReference("org.apache.flex.mdl.beads.views.ListView"); IBeadModel: ClassReference("org.apache.flex.html.beads.models.ArraySelectionModel"); IBeadLayout: ClassReference(null); /*"org.apache.flex.html.beads.layouts.Vertic

Re: [FlexJS] [Discuss] Add support for "automationName" for making unit-tests simpler

2017-01-16 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Looks like the mailing list removed the css snippet you posted. Thanks, Om On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Carlos Rovira < carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > for example in mdl:List the css is: > > > 2017-01-16 9:58 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz : > > > Hi Alex, > > > > Could you

Re: [FlexJS] [Discuss] Add support for "automationName" for making unit-tests simpler

2017-01-16 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Chris, for example in mdl:List the css is: 2017-01-16 9:58 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz : > Hi Alex, > > Could you eventually whip up a little example of how to do what you > describe in the last paragraph? > I’m actually really new to the ActionScript + MXML side of FlexJS, but > very willing

Re: [FlexJS] [Discuss] Add support for "automationName" for making unit-tests simpler

2017-01-16 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi Alex, Could you eventually whip up a little example of how to do what you describe in the last paragraph? I’m actually really new to the ActionScript + MXML side of FlexJS, but very willing to learn ;-) Chris Am 16.01.17, 07:41 schrieb "Alex Harui" : On 1/15/17, 9:17 AM, "C

Re: [FlexJS] [Discuss] Add support for "automationName" for making unit-tests simpler

2017-01-15 Thread Alex Harui
On 1/15/17, 9:17 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Hi, > >Well simply adding an automationName attribute would be small and simple, >adding beads would be more PAYG, but also a lot of more code. >What would be cool would be if we could add such an AutomationBead >similarly as skinClass would be add

Re: [FlexJS] [Discuss] Add support for "automationName" for making unit-tests simpler

2017-01-15 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi, Well simply adding an automationName attribute would be small and simple, adding beads would be more PAYG, but also a lot of more code. What would be cool would be if we could add such an AutomationBead similarly as skinClass would be added in Spark. Some configuration that allows adding A

Re: [FlexJS] [Discuss] Add support for "automationName" for making unit-tests simpler

2017-01-13 Thread Alex Harui
On 1/13/17, 3:35 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" wrote: >mmm I was thinink on Injecting, but inject could be problematic since >mainly *all* components would get the automation bead and maybe that's not >what we want. Ejecting? mmm don't like the idea of "writing" it do

Re: [FlexJS] [Discuss] Add support for "automationName" for making unit-tests simpler

2017-01-13 Thread Carlos Rovira
mmm I was thinink on Injecting, but inject could be problematic since mainly *all* components would get the automation bead and maybe that's not what we want. Ejecting? mmm don't like the idea of "writing" it down to the component...don't know right now I like the spring framework philosophy f

Re: [FlexJS] [Discuss] Add support for "automationName" for making unit-tests simpler

2017-01-13 Thread Alex Harui
On 1/13/17, 11:09 AM, "piotrz" wrote: >Hi Guys, > >In my opinion injecting Beads by some configuration will confuse people. >As >I understand such Bead which adding automation name will take same >parameter >with this name. > >Once you have Beads in your view it's giving really nice and clean

Re: [FlexJS] [Discuss] Add support for "automationName" for making unit-tests simpler

2017-01-13 Thread Alex Harui
On 1/13/17, 11:03 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" wrote: >Hi great to think in it as a bead. But this makes me thing about a way to >"inject the beads" so we doesn't need to touch code, but some config that >remove the inject of automation beads in all components...(the

Re: [FlexJS] [Discuss] Add support for "automationName" for making unit-tests simpler

2017-01-13 Thread piotrz
with component. Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Discuss-Add-support-for-automationName-for-making-unit-tests-simpler-tp58230p58255.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing

Re: [FlexJS] [Discuss] Add support for "automationName" for making unit-tests simpler

2017-01-13 Thread Carlos Rovira
e: > > >Hi, > > > >I am currently writing some unit-tests for the Examples and encountered > >something I would like to discuss with you. > >For example, in FlexJSStore the search field doesn’t have an id so it is > >not very simple to select the field

Re: [FlexJS] [Discuss] Add support for "automationName" for making unit-tests simpler

2017-01-13 Thread Alex Harui
My thought was that automated testing properties would be a separate bead. That way you can more easily rip it out before going to production. My 2 cents, -Alex On 1/13/17, 5:53 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Hi, > >I am currently writing some unit-tests for the Examp

[FlexJS] [Discuss] Add support for "automationName" for making unit-tests simpler

2017-01-13 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi, I am currently writing some unit-tests for the Examples and encountered something I would like to discuss with you. For example, in FlexJSStore the search field doesn’t have an id so it is not very simple to select the field. I could simply give the field an id, but I remembered in the old

Re: Policy on commiting unit tests?

2016-01-15 Thread Alex Harui
On 1/15/16, 7:26 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote: >Which project? > >I have used @Ignore in the past. You could do that and point to the test >file and method name in the JIRA issue. (if this is Falcon) +1 -Alex

Re: Policy on commiting unit tests?

2016-01-15 Thread Andy Dufilie
file and method name in the JIRA issue. (if this is Falcon) > > Mike > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Andy Dufilie > wrote: > > > I would like to write some unit tests for issues I know about, but I'm > > unsure how to proceed. Should I commit the unit tes

Re: Policy on commiting unit tests?

2016-01-15 Thread Michael Schmalle
Which project? I have used @Ignore in the past. You could do that and point to the test file and method name in the JIRA issue. (if this is Falcon) Mike On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Andy Dufilie wrote: > I would like to write some unit tests for issues I know about, but I'm >

Policy on commiting unit tests?

2016-01-15 Thread Andy Dufilie
I would like to write some unit tests for issues I know about, but I'm unsure how to proceed. Should I commit the unit tests even if they currently fail? I can create JIRA issues, but I know that unit tests are helpful as well so I would like to know how to contribute those even if I

Re: [FalconJX] unit tests

2016-01-14 Thread Michael Schmalle
Mike On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 1/14/16, 12:17 PM, "Michael Schmalle" > wrote: > > >I just did a super clean on compiler, compiler.jx and compiler.jx.tests > >then a build and I have 14 failing unit tests out of 1250. > &

Re: [FalconJX] unit tests

2016-01-14 Thread Alex Harui
On 1/14/16, 12:17 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote: >I just did a super clean on compiler, compiler.jx and compiler.jx.tests >then a build and I have 14 failing unit tests out of 1250. > >Do these tests use asjs repo for anything? I thought I had set up the default Ant tar

[FalconJX] unit tests

2016-01-14 Thread Michael Schmalle
I just did a super clean on compiler, compiler.jx and compiler.jx.tests then a build and I have 14 failing unit tests out of 1250. Do these tests use asjs repo for anything? Mike

Re: [TLF Unit Tests]

2015-12-27 Thread Harbs
Well, I tried explicitly setting the font, and nothing I tried helped. I’m leaving it alone for now. If anyone wants to try and fix the tests, feel free… On Dec 27, 2015, at 5:21 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Any Flex-based app should default to Verdana or Arial unless specified > otherwise. Not su

Re: [TLF Unit Tests]

2015-12-27 Thread Alex Harui
Any Flex-based app should default to Verdana or Arial unless specified otherwise. Not sure what AS-only apps will do. On 12/27/15, 1:50 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >I just looked at it. It’s definitely not using embedded fonts. I also do >not see where it’s specifying the font used. On Mac it seems to b

Re: [TLF Unit Tests]

2015-12-27 Thread Harbs
I just looked at it. It’s definitely not using embedded fonts. I also do not see where it’s specifying the font used. On Mac it seems to be defaulting to Times New Roman. Any idea what it defaults to on Windows? On Dec 27, 2015, at 9:35 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > I have a Macbook Retina 15" as we

Re: [TLF Unit Tests]

2015-12-26 Thread Alex Harui
I have a Macbook Retina 15" as well. I don't normally run these tests but I just tried it and got 6 failures as well. I purposefully didn't sync up before running tests. My log has the last commit on Oct 19. I only found the word "embedAsCFF" in AliceScrollEmbed.as so that sort of implies that f

Re: [TLF Unit Tests]

2015-12-26 Thread Harbs
I would think there wouldn’t be a difference. I don’t know if the fonts are embedded. Do the tests pass for you on Mac? Maybe it’s a retina-specific difference? (I’m running the tests on a 15 in MacBook Pro Retina.) The odd thing is that I’m pretty sure that I did not used to get these failures

Re: [TLF Unit Tests]

2015-12-26 Thread Alex Harui
On 12/26/15, 10:06 PM, "Harbs" wrote: >A couple of things: > >Item I: > >There are six tests which have been constantly failing on my machine for >a long time. They are all in KeyboardGestureTests, and they are all tests >for page up gestures. It looks to me that the resulting indexes are >diff

[TLF Unit Tests]

2015-12-26 Thread Harbs
Unit Tests for some table features. I have very limited time and my experience with FlexUnit is not that great. Does anyone have time to work on this? Harbs

Re: TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-28 Thread Alex Harui
Oops, I meant ‘double-check Justin’s findings' On 1/24/15, 12:50 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Ha, that's what I get for not double checking justin. I'll revert in a >bit. >Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone. > >Harbs wrote: > > >Here’s the texts which are all clearly public d

Re: TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-25 Thread Harbs
Actually, I stand corrected. A likely source of the text is http://www.mechon-mamre.org/ Their texts are copyrighted. However, the tanach.xml file is not used anywhere, so we should probably remove it. On Jan 25, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> There’s a few freely availa

Re: TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-25 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > There’s a few freely available texts. The differences between them are very > minimal. The text in the file has been processed for TLF, and there’s no way > it’s going to match up to the text it came from. Just because a test is freely available doesn't mean it's free of copyright or in

Re: TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-25 Thread Harbs
I’m familiar with the Hebrew texts out there. There’s a few freely available texts. The differences between them are very minimal. The text in the file has been processed for TLF, and there’s no way it’s going to match up to the text it came from. I’m 100% confident that Adobe did not have acce

Re: TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-25 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > It’s actually a very small portion which is used in this file: > sampleArabic.xml. Any amount of text is an issue as "fair use" provisions are not universal. > If you have a suggestion here to make it better, feel free to swap out the > content for something else. It needs to be removed

Re: TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-25 Thread Alex Harui
On 1/25/15, 12:04 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >>The following are Adobe licensed and donated, so they are okay: >>> 1) Text from the Japanese OpenType guide. >> >> The original file is Adobe copyright and wasn't donated. > >This is a small section of the document in Japanese. I don’t think it’s a >prob

Re: TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-25 Thread Harbs
On Jan 25, 2015, at 9:06 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: >> 5) UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights > > This is copyright UN [1] according to copyright link at bottom of page [2] > which AFAIK hasn't expired. It’s actually a very small portion which is used in this file: sampleArabic.xml. I dou

Re: TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-24 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Here’s the texts which are all clearly public domain: > 1) Alice in Wonderland (and parts of it) > 2) Parts of Nathaniel Hawthorne by Ethan Brand > 3) John F. Kennedy’s “ask not” speech. > 4) The Barnsley Manifesto All of the above are public domain and need to be correctly licensed and at

Re: TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-24 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Are you telling me that if include pieces of the Bible, we’re REQUIRED to > give attribution to G-d in the NOTICE file? ;-) :-) Not exactly I believe you would need to attribute the version it come from for instance English Standard [1] or Revised Standard Version [2]. (Just as example

Re: TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-24 Thread Harbs
I did not see that. Are you telling me that if include pieces of the Bible, we’re REQUIRED to give attribution to G-d in the NOTICE file? ;-) On Jan 25, 2015, at 12:25 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> Any particular reason? > > As they spell out how public domain content needs to be delt

Re: TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-24 Thread Harbs
I’m not going to comment on this. TLF markup is Apache content. The only thing that might possibly be worth doing for the public domain text is adding to the NOTICE file that portions of the texts used for testing comes from public domain. On Jan 25, 2015, at 12:09 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: >

Re: TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-24 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Any particular reason? As they spell out how public domain content needs to be delt with ie keep origin license and attribution in the the NOTICE file. Justin

Re: TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-24 Thread Harbs
Any particular reason? It’s interesting if you like racing about legal issues, but I don’t see what it has to do with our discussion. On Jan 25, 2015, at 12:15 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > You can also want to read: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-72 > https://issues.apach

Re: TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-24 Thread Alex Harui
You said "And last I cheaked Alice in wonder land wasn't under an Apache license” I took that to mean that Alice wasn’t properly donated. On 1/24/15, 1:51 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Ha, that's what I get for not double checking justin. I'll revert in a >>bit. > >The text in question

Re: TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-24 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, You can also want to read: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-72 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-75 Justin

Re: TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-24 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > The files are xml files. So an Apache license seems to be correct. Making something XML format doesn't change the original license. > The xml files contain text from public domain which is not a problem either, > so I don’t see any issue there at all. Putting an Apache licence on somethi

Re: TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-24 Thread Harbs
The files are xml files. So an Apache license seems to be correct. The xml files contain text from public domain which is not a problem either, so I don’t see any issue there at all. On Jan 24, 2015, at 11:51 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> Ha, that's what I get for not double checking ju

Re: TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-24 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Ha, that's what I get for not double checking justin. I'll revert in a bit. The text in question had an Apache licence on it, and as I stated that's incorrect. Were did I ask you to remove it from version control? Justin

Re: TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-24 Thread Alex Harui
Ha, that's what I get for not double checking justin. I'll revert in a bit. Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone. Harbs wrote: Here’s the texts which are all clearly public domain: 1) Alice in Wonderland (and parts of it) 2) Parts of Nathaniel Hawthorne by Ethan Brand 3) Joh

Re: TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-24 Thread Harbs
Here’s the texts which are all clearly public domain: 1) Alice in Wonderland (and parts of it) 2) Parts of Nathaniel Hawthorne by Ethan Brand 3) John F. Kennedy’s “ask not” speech. 4) The Barnsley Manifesto 5) UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights 6) The Bible in Hebrew The following are Adobe

Re: TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-24 Thread Harbs
It looks to me that we are fine with this: http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#can-works-placed-in-the-public-domain-be-included-in-apache-products I’ll be happy to check the rest of the test texts to make sure they are all public domain. On Jan 24, 2015, at 9:50 PM, Harbs wrote: > Why i

Re: TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-24 Thread Harbs
Why is that a problem? As Erik points out, it’s currently public domain text. I did not go through all the text, but I’m sure Adobe picked open domain text for all the tests.(i.e. I noticed the Hebrew text is text from the bible. You can’t get more open domain then that…);-) Swapping out the te

Re: TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-24 Thread Erik de Bruin
http://www.alice-in-wonderland.net/alice11.html#9 EdB On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Piotr, Harbs, > > Turns out the TLF tests are infested with text from Alice In Wonderland > and probably other famous text. Do either of you (or anybody else) have > time to overhaul the

TLF Unit Tests

2015-01-24 Thread Alex Harui
Piotr, Harbs, Turns out the TLF tests are infested with text from Alice In Wonderland and probably other famous text. Do either of you (or anybody else) have time to overhaul the tests? I think you probably would be faster at it than me. I’m not that familiar with FlexUnit and how it manages re

Re: [5/5] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-34711 Using the pattern defined for the apache project, now we're running the unit tests in the spark project as well.

2015-01-21 Thread Mihai Chira
All right, I've made a few changes to the way tests are run in order to support [1]. One question: can someone with a black belt in ant help me reduce the duplication between the '-test-run-execute' and '-test-run-execute-with-extra-lib' tasks in flexunit-tests.xml? Thanks! [1] https://issues.apa

Re: [5/5] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-34711 Using the pattern defined for the apache project, now we're running the unit tests in the spark project as well.

2015-01-21 Thread Mihai Chira
Thanks for the pointer, it allows me to make some steps forward. On 21 January 2015 at 13:41, Erik de Bruin wrote: >> My question is: how does the apache project compile, despite there >> being a unit test in >> frameworks\projects\apache\src\tests\promises\cases\PromisesBasicTests.as? > > I thin

Re: [5/5] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-34711 Using the pattern defined for the apache project, now we're running the unit tests in the spark project as well.

2015-01-21 Thread Erik de Bruin
> My question is: how does the apache project compile, despite there > being a unit test in > frameworks\projects\apache\src\tests\promises\cases\PromisesBasicTests.as? I think the framework projects only build classes included in the "*Classes.as" file in the root of the project (and their depend

Re: [5/5] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-34711 Using the pattern defined for the apache project, now we're running the unit tests in the spark project as well.

2015-01-21 Thread Mihai Chira
configure the test runner to show the >> entire stack trace of the error? >> Thanks. >> >> On 6 January 2015 at 17:58, wrote: >>> FLEX-34711 Using the pattern defined for the apache project, now we're >>> running the unit tests in the sp

Re: Unit tests in TLF

2015-01-08 Thread Harbs
n error which we are expecting, but >> GlobalSettings.resourceStringFunction do not return any text for >> "invalidReplaceTextPositions". >> >> Could we have some bug in that area ? >> >> Piotr >> >> >> >> - >> Apache Flex PMC >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-tests-in-TLF-tp36199p44215.html >> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: Unit tests in TLF

2015-01-08 Thread Harbs
". > > Could we have some bug in that area ? > > Piotr > > > > - > Apache Flex PMC > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-tests-in-TLF-tp36199p44215.html > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Unit tests in TLF

2015-01-07 Thread piotrz
uot;invalidReplaceTextPositions". Could we have some bug in that area ? Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-tests-in-TLF-tp36199p44215.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [5/5] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-34711 Using the pattern defined for the apache project, now we're running the unit tests in the spark project as well.

2015-01-07 Thread Erik de Bruin
2015 at 17:58, wrote: >> FLEX-34711 Using the pattern defined for the apache project, now we're >> running the unit tests in the spark project as well. >> >> >> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk/repo >> Commit: http://git-wip-us.ap

Re: [5/5] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-34711 Using the pattern defined for the apache project, now we're running the unit tests in the spark project as well.

2015-01-06 Thread Mihai Chira
Yes, I'm trying to run them via ant. You're right, the failure could happen in the [Before] method. When I next get round to it (probably next week, as I'll be travelling soon) I'll try to move everything in the test methods, hoping for a stack trace. Thank you for your suggestion. On 6 January 20

Re: [5/5] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-34711 Using the pattern defined for the apache project, now we're running the unit tests in the spark project as well.

2015-01-06 Thread piotrz
Hi Mihai, Are you running these tests using ant? I see only that options verbose=true is related in somehow to reports errors. Maybe this test is failing in "Before" method or in the test constructor - because report should show you the cause if it is failed in the tests method.- I don't have acce

Re: [5/5] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-34711 Using the pattern defined for the apache project, now we're running the unit tests in the spark project as well.

2015-01-06 Thread Mihai Chira
ow we're > running the unit tests in the spark project as well. > > > Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk/repo > Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk/commit/6dadf6dd > Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk/tree/

RE: Unit tests in TLF

2014-10-06 Thread piotrz
Thanks Michael. Your help was crucial. :) I hope to push next part of TLF tests soon to develop branch. :) Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-tests-in-TLF-tp36199p41123.html Sent from

RE: Unit tests in TLF

2014-10-06 Thread Michael A. Labriola
>I have merged my code to develop branch. I saw that TLF build correctly so I >can assume that everything is working fine. :) Nice work. Congratulations and good job

Re: Unit tests in TLF

2014-10-05 Thread Harbs
orking fine. :) > > In this location bin\apps\automation_apps\bin\ we should see xmls file with > reports for results of unit tests - If someone could take a look whether > they did create on the machine. - Don't know how to do this. > > Piotr > > > &g

Re: Unit tests in TLF

2014-10-05 Thread piotrz
I have merged my code to develop branch. I saw that TLF build correctly so I can assume that everything is working fine. :) In this location bin\apps\automation_apps\bin\ we should see xmls file with reports for results of unit tests - If someone could take a look whether they did create on the

Re: Unit tests in TLF

2014-10-01 Thread piotrz
Ok Thanks Erik. I will try to merge today my branch into develop. Will see what will blow up ;) Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-tests-in-TLF-tp36199p40978.html Sent from the Apache

Re: Unit tests in TLF

2014-09-30 Thread Erik de Bruin
ion. EdB > > Piotr > > > > - > Apache Flex PMC > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-tests-in-TLF-tp36199p40972.html > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Na

Re: Unit tests in TLF

2014-09-30 Thread piotrz
in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-tests-in-TLF-tp36199p40972.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: Unit tests in TLF

2014-09-29 Thread Michael A. Labriola
>I have missed something from your previous response and didn't try CIListener. >- I am really sorry about it. Now it is working, I can move forward. No problems at all. I just wanted to know if you had tried so I could help you debug it.

RE: Unit tests in TLF

2014-09-28 Thread piotrz
-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-tests-in-TLF-tp36199p40950.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: Unit tests in TLF

2014-09-28 Thread Michael A. Labriola
Hi, Asking again, are you using the CIListener or the AIRCIListener? Those are the components that do this work for you. Mike -Original Message- From: piotrz [mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2014 2:45 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: RE: Unit tests in

RE: Unit tests in TLF

2014-09-28 Thread piotrz
On the screenshot there is a bit mess in my project, because I have tried several things ;) Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/Unit-tests-in-TLF-tp36199p40948.html Sent from the Apach

RE: Unit tests in TLF

2014-09-23 Thread piotrz
Are you saying that app should automatically respond to my script - ok I will try to build small project with Unit Tests and Ant to see whether it will work. Maybe I have to in somehow reorganize current TLF unit test project. Thanks Michael will back with the results. Piotr - Apache

RE: Unit tests in TLF

2014-09-23 Thread Michael A. Labriola
Piotr- > Should I dispatch some event through the -> flexunituirunner:TestRunnerBase ? If you are using any of the flexunit CI pieces they take care of that communication back to the launching process for you. I don't know if you are or are not. Dispatching an event is not ideal as the TestRunn

Re: Unit tests in TLF

2014-09-23 Thread piotrz
Hi Harbs, If someone help me beat this problem couple of tests will be ready for you for sure. :) Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-tests-in-TLF-tp36199p40883.html Sent from the

Re: Unit tests in TLF

2014-09-23 Thread Harbs
ub modules, swc textLayout_editBar, textLayout_ui) - it should > build into automation_apps/bin > > This is how it looks for now. As a next step I will be working on launch > more tests classes and change build.xml file for automation of tests. > > Piotr > > >

Re: Unit tests in TLF

2014-09-22 Thread piotrz
Hi Guys, I would like to build tlf unit tests and running from ant build.xml file these tests. I did it without a problem: It's running a tests without a problem, but what should a I do to say to my script "Hey I have finished my tests here you go my results!" ? Curr

Re: Unit tests in TLF

2014-05-18 Thread piotrz
Hi Alex, Sorry for the delay. I did try to put folder witch contains simple.xml file and other files require for Test cases. Piotr - Apache Flex Committer piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-tests-in-TLF

Re: Unit tests in TLF

2014-05-13 Thread Alex Harui
for now. As a next step I will be working on launch >more tests classes and change build.xml file for automation of tests. > >Piotr > > > > > > > > >- >Apache Flex Committer >piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >-- >View this message in context: >http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-tests-in-TLF-tp3 >6199p37516.html >Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Unit tests in TLF

2014-05-11 Thread piotrz
ml file for automation of tests. Piotr - Apache Flex Committer piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-tests-in-TLF-tp36199p37516.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Unit tests in TLF

2014-05-03 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > If you can launch the test automatically, that would be best, IMO. But having test to run is certainly better than the current situation were we can't run the tests. Check in it if it's an improvement over before (which sounds like it is) and if it doesn't break anything else. Thanks, Ju

Re: Unit tests in TLF

2014-05-03 Thread Alex Harui
If you can launch the test automatically, that would be best, IMO. -Alex On 5/3/14 5:20 AM, "piotrz" wrote: >I have managed to build unit tests applications for TLF using ant. >The result of this build is Flex application witch we could manually >launch >in the browse

Re: Unit tests in TLF

2014-05-03 Thread piotrz
I have managed to build unit tests applications for TLF using ant. The result of this build is Flex application witch we could manually launch in the browser and start unit tests. I think this is not what we are looking for yes ? How should it work? Similar to mustella tests ? 1) built of TLF

RE: Unit tests in TLF

2014-04-06 Thread piotrz
che-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-tests-in-TLF-tp36199p36679.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: Unit tests in TLF

2014-04-06 Thread Michael A. Labriola
>In flex unit 4 most of those information about test we have got into >TestRunnerBase. When I add FU 4 to project I've simple removed all of those >methods and UI for display information and I replaced it one line of code >. In FlexUnit4, the information doesn't do into TestRunnerBase really.

Re: Unit tests in TLF

2014-04-06 Thread Alex Harui
ass will have 100 tests methods all of them will be run one by one. What do you think about this solution ? Piotr - Apache Flex Committer piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-tests-in-TLF-tp36199p36668.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Unit tests in TLF

2014-04-06 Thread piotrz
ames without methods. - so if selected class will have 100 tests methods all of them will be run one by one. What do you think about this solution ? Piotr - Apache Flex Committer piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble

Re: Unit tests in TLF

2014-03-26 Thread Alex Harui
;2) Try to run at least one test. >3) Run ant script > >Piotr :) > > > >- >Apache Flex Committer >piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >-- >View this message in context: >http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-tests-in-TLF-tp3 >6199p36401.html >Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Unit tests in TLF

2014-03-26 Thread piotrz
l.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-tests-in-TLF-tp36199p36401.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: FlexUnit was Unit tests in TLF

2014-03-24 Thread Michael A. Labriola
>BTW, a key motivating factor in creating a set of FlexUnit tests is to try to >conform to that government standard you told me about. Do you have a 5 >sentence summary of what a test suite needs to cover? Is it measured purely >by code coverage or do you have to have boundary tests, negative

RE: Unit tests in TLF

2014-03-24 Thread Michael A. Labriola
>FlexJS will keep metadata on the JS side, probably as simple properties on the >classes and/or functions. I imagine we'll write a library that abstracts the >fetching of metadata and returns it as an array of strings or maybe as JSON. >If we could easily retrofit the metadata fetching in Flex

Re: Unit tests in TLF

2014-03-24 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/24/14 9:26 AM, "Michael A. Labriola" wrote: >>OK, I didn't see any non-Flex apps around the runners. The deal is the >>mx and Spark apps can't wrap the runners and load in FlexJS classes at >>the same time. I think I'll just have to replace the Spark app with a >>FlexJS app. > >No proble

  1   2   >