Hi,
Done.
justin
Sure. Instead of "General requirements" I would say "Requirements for
compiling source" or "To compile the source code you need". And for
the next header (currently "Software Dependencies") I'd say
"Requirements for using Squiggly binaries" or "To use the binaries you
need".
On 5 September 2014 11
Hi,
> Could we find a way to specify that Squiggly in binary mode only
> depends on the dictionaries, while in source mode, to be built, it
> also depends on java, ant, and flex?
That's in the README but if you think it can be clearer please suggest some
changes.
Thanks,
Justin
Could we find a way to specify that Squiggly in binary mode only
depends on the dictionaries, while in source mode, to be built, it
also depends on java, ant, and flex? I'm worried that some flex
developers might not download/use the swcs thinking that it's too
complicated to set them up.
On 5 Sep
Hi,
> I think the binaries are not in the binaries folder, so the links should be:
Fixed.
> * Punctuation errors in:
Fixed and reworded a little.
Thanks,
Justin
* "Apache Squiggly 1.0" must actually be "Apache Flex Squiggly 1.0"
* None of the mirrors seem to have these artifacts:
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/flex/squiggly/1.0/binaries/apache-flex-squiggly-1.0-bin.zip
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/flex/squiggly/1.0/binaries/apache-flex-squig
Hi,
On staging [1] Once a few people have checked I'll make it live and send the
announcement out.
Thanks,
Justin
1 http://flex.staging.apache.org/download-squiggly.html
