Sure. Instead of "General requirements" I would say "Requirements for compiling source" or "To compile the source code you need". And for the next header (currently "Software Dependencies") I'd say "Requirements for using Squiggly binaries" or "To use the binaries you need".
On 5 September 2014 11:32, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > >> Could we find a way to specify that Squiggly in binary mode only >> depends on the dictionaries, while in source mode, to be built, it >> also depends on java, ant, and flex? > > That's in the README but if you think it can be clearer please suggest some > changes. > > Thanks, > Justin >
