Hi,
> Like modifying the .xml to add the 4.12 examples. That isn't a
> code change or recompilation either.
The XML is now compiled into application so yes that would require a
recompilation, and you would need to put new compiled swfs from a source
package that hasn't yet been voted on. Plea
On 8/25/14 7:53 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> So before I go and ask on general@incubator
>Ask away.
>
>> But it is ok to add a copy of explorer.html as index.html
>No code was changed or recompiled, it's a HTML file. If you really think
>it should be reverted go ahead and remove it.
I
Hi,
> So before I go and ask on general@incubator
Ask away.
> But it is ok to add a copy of explorer.html as index.html
No code was changed or recompiled, it's a HTML file. If you really think it
should be reverted go ahead and remove it.
Justin
On 8/25/14 12:29 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:11 AM, Justin Mclean
>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > Never mind. I misread your email as you wanting to fix the minor
>>issues
>> > before releasing.
>> No problem.
So before I go and ask on general@incubator, are some of
Hi,
> https://blogs.apache.org/roller-ui/authoring/preview/flex/?previewEntry=apache_flex_tourdeflex_1_0
> I assume you have the credentials to login?
Don't believe I do.
> If not, I can do it first thing in the morning (around 6 hours from now)
That should be fine.
Thanks,
Justin
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:11 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Never mind. I misread your email as you wanting to fix the minor issues
> > before releasing.
> No problem.
>
> > I am going to push it to prod now, before I go to sleep. Please do plan
> to
> > include the url in the announceme
Hi,
> Never mind. I misread your email as you wanting to fix the minor issues
> before releasing.
No problem.
> I am going to push it to prod now, before I go to sleep. Please do plan to
> include the url in the announcement. Iff someone raises an objection, you
> can simply remove the url fro
Done.
http://flex.apache.org/tourdeflex/explorer.html
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:04 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > But won't that require a new RC and a new vote? Are you okay with
>> skipping
>> > that p
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > But won't that require a new RC and a new vote? Are you okay with
> skipping
> > that part?
> Why? It what was voted on and released right?
>
>
Never mind. I misread your email as you wanting to fix the minor issues
before relea
Hi,
> But won't that require a new RC and a new vote? Are you okay with skipping
> that part?
Why? It what was voted on and released right?
Thanks,
Justin
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Are we good to push it to production?
>
> Unless anyone thinks the minor issues found so far should stop it being
> produced I'm fine for it to be pushed live.
>
>
But won't that require a new RC and a new vote? Are you okay with
Hi,
> Are we good to push it to production?
Unless anyone thinks the minor issues found so far should stop it being
produced I'm fine for it to be pushed live.
With a slight tweak we can change the announcement and remove the link and then
announce that next time we release.
Thanks,
Justin
Are we good to push it to production?
Thanks,
Om
On Aug 24, 2014 6:16 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > One minor issue we probably need to change where the loading bar is
> located which is not noticeable when running locally.
> >
> > Someone mind raising a JIRA?
>
> Done - https://issues
Hi,
> One minor issue we probably need to change where the loading bar is located
> which is not noticeable when running locally.
>
> Someone mind raising a JIRA?
Done - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34493
Thanks,
Justin
Hi Andrew,
> Under Spark components > Containers there is "TitleGroup". It should be
> "TileGroup", which is the heading you see in the right panel when you
> select that item.
>
> Also, "SkinableDataContainer" should be "SkinnableDataContainer". the item
> in the menu is incorrect, and the title
Nachricht-
> Von: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. August 2014 04:46
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Draft TourDeFlex announcement
>
> Hi,
>
> Raised JIRAs for these issues.
>
> >> - The Spark Video example produces a &
Announcement looks fine to me.
On 8/23/14 7:26 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>New draft, any other issues on the staging site or content changes below
>required before we announce the release?
>
>After the staging content is made live first of course.
>
>Thanks,
>Justin
>
>-
On 8/23/14 12:10 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>We had a big discussion about this when we released the first version of
>the Installer badge, installer config xml, etc. which goes on the website
>as well. You both might want to refresh on that thread before taking it
>to
>general@i.a.o.
I
Hi,
Raised JIRAs for these issues.
>> - The Spark Video example produces a "Playback Error"
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34490
>> - The Spark Module Load example just shows up the module panel for fragments
>> of a second and then disapears again.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/br
Hi,
New draft, any other issues on the staging site or content changes below
required before we announce the release?
After the staging content is made live first of course.
Thanks,
Justin
---
Hi,
> I should have said earlier that I am delighted the Tour is back. One of my
> favorite tools both in my own development work and for showing others what
> Flex and do and how easily it can do it.
Nice to hear. Now even better you can improve and add to the examples.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> - The Spark Video example produces a "Playback Error"
> - The Spark Module Load example just shows up the module panel for fragments
> of a second and then disapears again.
Mind raising JIRA's for these?
Justin
ftware.com]
> Gesendet: Samstag, 23. August 2014 15:20
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Draft TourDeFlex announcement
>
> Hi,
>
> > I checked http://flex.staging.apache.org/tourdeflex/explorer.html and
> > it looks that skins from examples are missing? Like in ex
Hi,
> I checked http://flex.staging.apache.org/tourdeflex/explorer.html and it
> looks that skins from examples are missing? Like in example for "Button
> Width Icon", I expected to see skin's files in tabs.
Nice feedback. Looks like a couple of examples are not showing all of the files
they sho
Hi,
> Can the page have a favicon?
Thanks for checking it out I've raised a JIRA for the misisng favicon here [1]
Justin
1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34488
Hi,
I checked http://flex.staging.apache.org/tourdeflex/explorer.html and it
looks that skins from examples are missing? Like in example for "Button
Width Icon", I expected to see skin's files in tabs.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Draft-
Can the page have a favicon? The tab is showing up with a blank rectangle
beside its name rather than an image in Chrome.
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Or directly go to the page:
> > http://flex.staging.apache.org/tourdeflex/explorer.html
> >
> > I will chec
Hi,
> Or directly go to the page:
> http://flex.staging.apache.org/tourdeflex/explorer.html
>
> I will check tomorrow morning for any feedback. If none, I will go ahead
> and push it to production.
Looks good to me.
One minor issue we probably need to change where the loading bar is located
Okay, it has been pushed into the staging area. You can test it by going
to
http://flex.staging.apache.org and selecting About Flex > Tour de Flex
Or directly go to the page:
http://flex.staging.apache.org/tourdeflex/explorer.html
I will check tomorrow morning for any feedback. If none, I will
Hi,
> In the meantime, I have couple of spare hours tonight and I want to make it
> productive. I am going to go with the RC3 bits
The RC3 bits and the tag are both identical so either is fine. If you run into
any issue post here I'm up or 5 or 6 hours yet.
Thanks,
Justin
We had a big discussion about this when we released the first version of
the Installer badge, installer config xml, etc. which goes on the website
as well. You both might want to refresh on that thread before taking it to
general@i.a.o.
In the meantime, I have couple of spare hours tonight and I
Hi,
> Might be a good question for general@incubator. Mind if I ask there?
Ask away. But I think we should set a good example here and not try and get
around the rules.
> I'm all for faster release cycles. I think it is 30 minutes minimum to
> validate the TDF RC.
It not really that complex t
On 8/22/14 11:12 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> We definitely want it to look good, but I would expect folks will find
>> lots of stuff when they start poking around, so I wouldn't spend too
>>much
>> time on it. IMO, if a problem is found, it would be fine to modify the
>> repo, make a
Hi,
> We definitely want it to look good, but I would expect folks will find
> lots of stuff when they start poking around, so I wouldn't spend too much
> time on it. IMO, if a problem is found, it would be fine to modify the
> repo, make a local build, and drop new files on the website.
Really?
IMO, it can wait until you're ready.
We definitely want it to look good, but I would expect folks will find
lots of stuff when they start poking around, so I wouldn't spend too much
time on it. IMO, if a problem is found, it would be fine to modify the
repo, make a local build, and drop new files
I have the RC3 bits from when I built it, but my main goal here is to make
sure that whatever goes on the website looks really good.
I will get the tag and build from there and see how things go.
Also, do we want to announce on the weekend? Let's wait until Monday
morning. That will also give
IIRC, I think you have to manually build that one example. That was a
build script change, but still, a change to the released sources. And we
might want to figure out why the OSMF video is black and that might
require a code change.
On 8/22/14 9:40 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> IMO, it
Hi,
> IMO, it doesn't matter since we're going to muck with the results to fix
> two or three known issues.
Much about == change where a few files live, I don't believe there needs to be
any changes to code or anything else.
Thanks,
Justin
On 8/22/14 9:18 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Should I build from the git repo or from the released src kit?
>Really has to be from the code in the release.
IMO, it doesn't matter since we're going to muck with the results to fix
two or three known issues.
Get it up there whatever way i
Hi,
> Should I build from the git repo or from the released src kit?
Really has to be from the code in the release.
> I thought I might get to fix some bugs on the way if I build from the repo.
Check out ApacheFlexTourDeFlex1.0 tag and you'll match what was in the release.
Just be careful as I
Should I build from the git repo or from the released src kit? I thought I
might get to fix some bugs on the way if I build from the repo.
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 9:06 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> I'm on it.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Alex Harui wr
I'm on it.
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Yes, I would like to wait for Om to put the binaries on flex.a.o so we can
> include a link like he suggested.
>
> On 8/22/14 7:52 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Anyone have anything to add/suggested change
Yes, I would like to wait for Om to put the binaries on flex.a.o so we can
include a link like he suggested.
On 8/22/14 7:52 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Anyone have anything to add/suggested changes?
>
>Thanks,
>Justin
>
>---
43 matches
Mail list logo
