If you use the AIR installer, it requires admin permissions to install to
the Program Files directory. If you export to any of the other file types,
it is a userland application that has no installer. In the case of the
linux installer, we outputted the application and are using debian package
ma
On 18/07/2013 14:30, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
It runs in userland on Windows and Mac...
So how does it write to c:\Program Files then ?
Tom
If not, we should aim to iterate over the common possible locations...
Tom
On 18/07/2013 14:41, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
I'm not sure if AIR 2.6 has the ability to execute non-specific
executables but I think it is worth a try.
-Nick
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Justin Mclean wrot
I'm not sure if AIR 2.6 has the ability to execute non-specific
executables but I think it is worth a try.
-Nick
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > you shouldn't use an absolute path for common utilities like tar, unzip,
> > etc.
>
> So a better fix would be j
Justin,
Most of those errors look like the debian packager was told to pick up your
user-id file permissions (I bet, that if you look in /etc/passwd, your
userid will be listed as user-id 1000). When this package is installed by
another user, the "owner" will be the first user created on the syst
Hi,
> you shouldn't use an absolute path for common utilities like tar, unzip,
> etc.
So a better fix would be just this?
var tar:File = tar = new File("tar");
var startupInfo:NativeProcessStartupInfo = new NativeProcessStartupInfo();
startupInfo.executable = tar;
startupInfo.arguments = argum
admin password? you mean root password? There should be no reason for an
AIR app to require root... It runs in userland on Windows and Mac...
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Why, what's up ?
>
> Just the install process of the installer package is poor. The
Hi,
> Does AIR 2.6 support an intermediate 'airi' output that we could drop our own
> package descriptions into for instance ?
I believe so.
> The poor quality thing is probably a lack of community feedback/install count
It's a bit more than that, but given I know nothing about Linux packaging i
you shouldn't use an absolute path for common utilities like tar, unzip,
etc. Depending on the distribution, they may be in /usr/bin/, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/sbin, or /usr/contib/bin. You should be able to assume that they are
in the path declaration.
-Nick
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Justin
On 18/07/2013 14:01, Justin Mclean wrote:
Just the install process of the installer package is poor. The generated deb
package is missing text and screen shots, needs admin password to install
(why?), complains it is poor quality and a few other things. It works but
that's about it.
It should
Hi,
> Why, what's up ?
Just the install process of the installer package is poor. The generated deb
package is missing text and screen shots, needs admin password to install
(why?), complains it is poor quality and a few other things. It works but
that's about it.
The installer itself is quit
On 18/07/2013 04:04, Justin Mclean wrote:
The user install process the install the installer form the package leaves
something to be desired, hopefully someone who knows more about Linux packaging
can help out here.
Why, what's up ?
Tom
Awesome!
On 7/17/13 8:48 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Fixed and we now have a working Linux installer that runs to completion!
>
>I've update the RC1 deb package, please take it for a run.
>
>Justin
Hi,
Fixed and we now have a working Linux installer that runs to completion!
I've update the RC1 deb package, please take it for a run.
Justin
Hi,
And the issue looks to be that the path to tar is /usr/bin/tar when it should
be /bin/tar.
Justin
Hi,
Here's the log I get:
Version 2.6.0 (linux)
Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI.
AIR version 2.6
Flash Player version 11.2
Creating Apache Flex home
Creating temporary directory
Downloading Apache Flex SDK from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.10.0/rc1/binaries
HI,
I've checked in my compiled installer for Linux into the RC1 binaries directory
- if someone else could give it a got that would be great.
The user install process the install the installer form the package leaves
something to be desired, hopefully someone who knows more about Linux packagi
Hi,
> I downloaded the AIR2.6 SDK (using the installer ;-) ) and then compiled,
> i.e. ran 'ant release' from the installer directory. The app compiles fine
> and runs fine.
I can get it to compile fine but the installer doesn't run to completion
getting an error just after it try the untar/ung
18 matches
Mail list logo
