Re: CS Extensions

Hi Om, I noticed the check-in. I'll try to take a look at it. I'm hoping that I'll have time now that (most of) my kids are going back to school. Things have not exactly been working out as I planned… :-( Harbs On Aug 6, 2013, at 1:57 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at

Re: CS Extensions

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Harbs wrote: > Hi Om, > > I've been drowning (in work) lately… :-( > > I'll try to get onto it. > > What does the code that you need to import look like? I'll be happy to > help with that. > > A could also ask the the product manager about getting an Extension >

Re: CS Extensions

Hi Om, I've been drowning (in work) lately… :-( I'll try to get onto it. What does the code that you need to import look like? I'll be happy to help with that. A could also ask the the product manager about getting an Extension Builder license. Extension Builder 3 should get more interesting

Re: CS Extensions

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 6/11/13 2:23 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: > > > >Alex, any chance you could snag us an open source license for Adobe > >Extension Builder? > I'll ask, but I think Adobe wants you to sign up for Creative Cloud. > > Thanks! I will ta

Re: CS Extensions

On 6/11/13 2:23 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: > >Alex, any chance you could snag us an open source license for Adobe >Extension Builder? I'll ask, but I think Adobe wants you to sign up for Creative Cloud. > >Also, was the spec for FXG donated? I see in the Adobe Flex White paper >that FXG

Re: CS Extensions

Harbs, Any update on this? In terms of functionality, I would really like this: In Illustrator, there is currently no straightforward way (AFAIK) to convert the Symbols library into individual .fxg files. What I have been doing is to convert the whole document into .fxg, parse the Library node

Re: CS Extensions

On 4/16/13 3:03 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > Hi, > >> Sounds like gobbledygook to me. Should I just ask Bob to give his okay to be >> sure? I think the code he wrote was on his own timeŠ > > Which probably still mean Adobe owns it if he's a full time employee at Adobe > - so we may need to g

Re: CS Extensions

Hi, > Sounds like gobbledygook to me. Should I just ask Bob to give his okay to be > sure? I think the code he wrote was on his own time… Which probably still mean Adobe owns it if he's a full time employee at Adobe - so we may need to get permission from them. Justin

Re: CS Extensions

If that's easy to do, it probably wouldn't hurt. Otherwise we should get official answers. On 4/16/13 2:04 PM, "Harbs" wrote: > Sounds like gobbledygook to me. Should I just ask Bob to give his okay to be > sure? I think the code he wrote was on his own timeŠ > > On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:37 PM,

Re: CS Extensions

Sounds like gobbledygook to me. Should I just ask Bob to give his okay to be sure? I think the code he wrote was on his own time… On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:37 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > On 4/16/13 11:17 AM, "Harbs" wrote: > >> There's one other issue with my code: >> >> All the code is min

Re: CS Extensions

On 4/16/13 11:17 AM, "Harbs" wrote: > There's one other issue with my code: > > All the code is mine with the partial exception of NativeComboBox. > > NativeComboBox was the result of a discussion between Bob Stucky (a friend and > Adobe employee) and me. I observed that there were extension

Re: CS Extensions

There's one other issue with my code: All the code is mine with the partial exception of NativeComboBox. NativeComboBox was the result of a discussion between Bob Stucky (a friend and Adobe employee) and me. I observed that there were extensions created by Adobe that had dropdowns that extended

Re: CS Extensions

On Apr 16, 2013, at 7:26 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Thanks for working on this. I have some "process" tasks for you. > > 1) I just skimmed the commit email and noticed that the files need Apache > headers. Okay. I'll add them. > 2) I think you mentioned that some of this code was originally writ

Re: CS Extensions

Thanks for working on this. I have some "process" tasks for you. 1) I just skimmed the commit email and noticed that the files need Apache headers. 2) I think you mentioned that some of this code was originally written by someone else? I think we need an email from him in the mailing list archi

Re: CS Extensions

I just pushed an initial skeleton framework of the panel with some placeholder components there to give an idea what the different components look like. Some of the methods I used for styling is a bit hacky, but it works… All the code needed for styling in both a light and dark UI is there. Ther

Re: CS Extensions

Someone has done that already: http://ajarproductions.com/pages/products/in5/ On Apr 15, 2013, at 10:06 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > If this would be indesign to html5. That would be very cool. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Apr 15, 2013, at 2:45 PM, Harbs wrote: > >> I just asked Olav Kvern who

Re: CS Extensions

If this would be indesign to html5. That would be very cool. Sent from my iPhone On Apr 15, 2013, at 2:45 PM, Harbs wrote: > I just asked Olav Kvern who's done a bunch of path work for InDesign and > Illustrator and he's okay with donating his work to this project. That should > help jump-sta

Re: CS Extensions

I just asked Olav Kvern who's done a bunch of path work for InDesign and Illustrator and he's okay with donating his work to this project. That should help jump-start things very nicely! On Apr 15, 2013, at 9:17 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > Drawscript looks good, except that it writes to a

Re: CS Extensions

Drawscript looks good, except that it writes to actionscript/javascript directly. I dont think that it is a good idea necessarily. In the case of JS, it is geared towards drawing on the Canvas element. Problem is that anything drawn on the canvas immediately loses hitTest, accessibility,etc. Tha

Re: CS Extensions

DrawScript looks cool. I would not hold my breath on getting the source donated, but if someone wants to try, that would be cool. On Apr 15, 2013, at 8:37 PM, jude wrote: > I'm all for this! I think we should at least attempt to get the source to > the current FXG export extensions or have they

Re: CS Extensions

I'm all for this! I think we should at least attempt to get the source to the current FXG export extensions or have they been donated already? Also, check out DrawScript . On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 2:35 AM, Harbs wrote: > I'd like to start that project to export FXG from creat

Re: CS Extensions

One or all of these are required (assuming we want compatibility for CS5 and forward. If it's CS6 and forward they will be slightly different)): apeddelta.swc CSXSLibrary-2.0-sdk-3.4-public.swc csaw_illustrator.swc csaw_indesign.swc csaw_photoshop.swc MXThemeSync.swc The csaw libs are only neces

Re: CS Extensions

On 4/15/13 1:19 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >> >>> 2) CS Extensions have dependencies on a number of Adobe swcs. How do we >>> handle the project vis a vis Apache's policies and binaries? I don't think >>> those dependencies can be includedŠ >>> >>> >> We can always have a build script that downloa

Re: CS Extensions

FWIW, Adobe made the CS extension for PS available here: http://download.macromedia.com/pub/photoshop/photoshopcs5_fxg_p2_mac_093010. zxp http://download.macromedia.com/pub/photoshop/photoshopcs5_fxg_p2_win32_09301 0.zxp http://download.macromedia.com/pub/photoshop/photoshopcs5_fxg_p2_win64_09301

Re: CS Extensions

I'm a bit crazy for trying to start this right now. I'm off to a conference in less than two weeks, and time is not exactly a commodity in large supply right now… ;-) It will likely remain largely a skeleton for a few weeks, but at least I can get it started. I figure the support will come in s

Re: CS Extensions

Exciting stuff! I would love to help you on this one, time permitting. On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Harbs wrote: > I'd like to start that project to export FXG from creative suite apps. > > Some questions: > 1) Should I start this on a personal github account, or have we settled on > somet