+1 (binding)
-Mark
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Kessler CTR Mark J <
mark.kessler@usmc.mil> wrote:
> +0
>
> I forgot to commit the README update last night . After that happens I'm
> good. (or if anyone else wants to update it)
>
> OS: Win 7 64bit English
>
> -Successfully built from
+0
I forgot to commit the README update last night . After that happens I'm
good. (or if anyone else wants to update it)
OS: Win 7 64bit English
-Successfully built from source (after changing path).
-Successfully installed.
-Successfully downloaded sdk using installer.
-Mark
On 6/22/15, 11:50 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>>> Aha! Your cache is on! I’ll try that shortly. That usually means a
>>> file’s URL has characters in it that are not allowed on Windows.
>>
>> I just tried now with cache on and it also worked !
>
>In case it helps, this is the log of one of the
Hi,
> Also, Justin reported the same issue on Mac
If it helps, it was OS X and with no cache, non en_US locale (but located in
the US) and with default options in installer.
Thanks
Justin
//paste.apache.org/grVW
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 07:34:11 +0100
>
>> Aha! Your cache is on! I’ll
c
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 07:34:11 +0100
>
>> Aha! Your cache is on! I’ll try that shortly. That usually means a
>> file’s URL
ere will be an Installer 3.3.
Ok, so, we can carry on my +1 binding
Thanks,
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 04:57:15 +
On 6/22/15, 10:33 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> but I don’t think there is a minimum level of scrutiny required in
>>order to cast a binding
>> vote.
>
>As per [1] you need to:
>"Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download the signed source
>code package, compile it as provided
Hi,
> but I don’t think there is a minimum level of scrutiny required in order to
> cast a binding
> vote.
As per [1] you need to:
"Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download the signed source code
package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting executable on their own
platf
On 6/22/15, 9:57 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Aha! Your cache is on! I’ll try that shortly. That usually means a
>file’s URL has characters in it that are not allowed on Windows.
Well, it worked for me, with both cache on and cache off. I did both
twice.
I’m wondering if you are choosing some
On 6/22/15, 3:04 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>Ok, yeah, I had read that before. My time is limited and also why I asked,
>i don't want to just +1 something and not follow procedure, I will stay
>out
>of this thread now, sorry.
While we don’t want PMC voters to “not follow procedure”, the goa
ss 10 14
>progress 11 14
>progress 12 14
>progress 13 14
>progress 14 14
>
>
>Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
>------------------------
>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org; webdoubl...@hotmail.com
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer
gt; From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org; webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:15:56 +
>
> I got home and tried to install FlexJS on my home Windows computer and it
> worked fine there
03, just tried again and had the same issue.
>Forgive me if I missed something though.
>
>Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
>--------------------
>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
>> Date: Mon, 22 Jun
rgive me if I missed something though.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:59:16 +
>
> OK, the falcon script got
ic THOMAS
> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:14:50 -0400
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
> wrote:
>
>>> OK, the falcon script got bust
ng the swc
needed to be committed, out/* is gitignored.
Mike
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
>
> > From: aha...@adobe.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
> > Date: Mon, 22 J
d the same issue.
Forgive me if I missed something though.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:59:16 +
>
> OK,
you had a
> > installer 3.2 installed before, uninstall it first, play with the new
> > installer and report.
> >
> >
> > Frédéric THOMAS
> >
> >
> > ------------
> > > Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 17:40:30 -0400
> > > Sub
re, uninstall it first, play with the new
> installer and report.
>
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
>
> > Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 17:40:30 -0400
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
> > From: teotig
>Thanks
>Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
>
>> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
>> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:01:55 +0100
>>
>> +1 Binding
>>
>>
installed before,
uninstall it first, play with the new installer and report.
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 17:40:30 -0400
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
Hey guys, I am really naive when it comes to this testing release stuff. I
don't have a lot of time but what is the exact process to do it right?
Mike
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:14 PM, piotrz wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> Package
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-f
+1 (binding)
Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-fle
x-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src.zip
Java 1.7
OS: Windows 7 amd64 6.1
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved lice
> +1 Binding
I hold on my previous vote until we have more clarification on the 3003
Thanks
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
> Da
> From: bigosma...@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:32:36 -0700
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> +1 Binding
>
> Source compiles fine
> Signatures match
> Minor is
+1 Binding
Source compiles fine
Signatures match
Minor issue with README, but not worth a -1
Thanks,
Om
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> +1
>
> Despite the problems getting the source version to compile, when it does,
> it works as expected. Since the Installer is mostl
+1
Despite the problems getting the source version to compile, when it does,
it works as expected. Since the Installer is mostly a binary convenience
utility, it gets my vote.
EdB
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> And this time I made sure I ran the ApprovalScript before h
And this time I made sure I ran the ApprovalScript before hitting send.
+1
Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-flex-s
dk-installer-3.2.0-src.tar.gz
Java 1.7
OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
RELE
29 matches
Mail list logo
