os Rovira
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2015 11:55
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [FlexJS] Maven-friendly folders
>
> maybe b) should be better, since I think 2 folders could be a bit of a
> nightmare. So I vote for a unique "flex" folder
>
> 201
gt; Von: carlos.rov...@gmail.com im Auftrag von
> Carlos Rovira
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2015 11:19
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [FlexJS] Maven-friendly folders
>
> Just was thinking on that. Thanks Chris to rise the mvn-like-folders! :)
>
> the four path
Just was thinking on that. Thanks Chris to rise the mvn-like-folders! :)
the four paths are needed in maven.
Regarding "as" vs "flex", is hard to decide. both seems ok to me. Maybe
"flex" has more meaning...but "as" refers to the extension of the language
(and this should make us think in what ha
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> Well if we wanted to go more in the direction of a Maven-firendly
> structure, it would probably be:
>
> - src/main/as (or src/main/flex or src/main/flexjs ... don't know what we
> want to call the highest level ... I don't really care as
