On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
> Well if we wanted to go more in the direction of a Maven-firendly > structure, it would probably be: > > - src/main/as (or src/main/flex or src/main/flexjs ... don't know what we > want to call the highest level ... I don't really care as long as we stick > to the decision) > I think src/main/as makes sense in this context. For example, it would be: frameworks/projects/Binding/src/main/as/.. frameworks/projects/Charts/src/main/as/... etc. > - src/main/resources (for config file, static resources etc.) > - src/test/as (for test code) > - src/test/resources (for resources needed during tests) > > I personally would prefer "src/main/flex" and src/test/flex" as I think > that we also have mxml and that is not as but both sort of "are flex" ... > what do you think? > > Chris > > ________________________________________ > Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2015 09:18 > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: [FlexJS] Maven-friendly folders > > Hi, > > Now that all JS files are generated via cross-compiling, the folder > structure in each SWC project currently looks like: > > SWCFolder/as/src -- The source code > /as/tests -- Any FlexUnit tests > /js/out -- The cross-compiled output > *-manifest.xml -- The MXML manifests > compile-config.xml -- config file for SWF > compile-asjs-config.xml -- config file for JS > build.xml -- The Ant build script > > I don't think we need the "as" folder level. We had it since we used to > have a js/src and wanted to distinguish between languages in the sources, > so I was thinking we'd bring the as/src and as/tests folder to the top > level as in: > > SWCFolder/src -- The source code > /tests -- Any FlexUnit tests > > and I'm wondering if there is some other organization of folders that > might be more Maven-friendly. > > Thoughts? I'm shutting down for tonight. Will check back in my morning. > > -Alex > >
